The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of the literature on integrating sustainability into engineering curricula
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Only a few surveys [102,116,152,183,213,221,226,240] have so far attempted to map the existing proposals of education for sustainability in computing, and their scopes have been rather limited.”
From Sustainability in computing education: A systematic literature review (2024) · cites this paper as [240]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,351
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges
Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002 · Cited by 1,655
Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., Lambrechts, W., Lukman, R. K., & Hugé, J. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048 · Cited by 1,256
Self-citationLozano, R., Lukman, R. K., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D., & Lambrechts, W. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.006 · Cited by 1,244
Self-citationLozano, R., Merrill, M., Sammalisto, K., Ceulemans, K., & Lozano, F. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101889 · Cited by 904
Dissonance in students' perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability
Kagawa, F. (2007) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/14676370710817174 · Cited by 563
Lambrechts, W., Mulà, I., Ceulemans, K., Molderez, I., & Gaeremynck, V. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.034 · Cited by 523
Sustainability in higher education: a systematic review with focus on management education
Figueiró, P. S., & Raufflet, E. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.118 · Cited by 461
Lozano, R. (2009) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.07.005 · Cited by 424
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating sustainability into higher education curriculum through a transdisciplinary perspective
Tasdemir, C., & Gazo, R. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121759 · Cited by 161
Sustainability in computing education: A systematic literature review
Peters, A.-K., Capilla, R., Coroamă, V. C., Heldal, R., Lago, P., Leifler, O., Moreira, A., Fernandes, J. P., Penzenstadler, B., Porras, J., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3639060 · Cited by 78
Incorporating sustainability in engineering curriculum: A study of the Australian universities
Arefin, M. A., Nabi, M. N., Sadeque, S., & Gudimetla, P. (2021) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-07-2020-0271 · Cited by 59
Rethinking sustainability in engineering education: a call for systemic change
Sabri, O. K. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1587430 · Cited by 28
Integrating Sustainability in Engineering: A Global Review
Alhassani, F., Saleem, M., & Messner, J. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17156930 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Thürer, M., Tomašević, I., Stevenson, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D.
- Affiliations
- Jinan University (CN)
- University of Belgrade (RS)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Qu, Ting
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 181
- Pages
- 608-617
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2777131048
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 109
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Repository of the University of Belgrade Faculty of Organizational Sciences (RFOS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71750410694, 51475095, 71672074)
- Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2016A030311041)
- Guangdong Special Support Scheme (2014TQ01X706)
- Guangdong Education Department
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Sustainability in Higher Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Social Sciences › Development › Engineering Education and Global Impact
- Keywords
- sustainability education, engineering curriculum, curriculum integration, higher education, undergraduate engineering education, postgraduate engineering education, stakeholder influence, accreditation, industry partnerships, competency-based evaluation, engineering education reform
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
