The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies
Abstract
Abstract The value of green innovation on achieving sustainable development is increasingly recognized in recent years. This paper explores whether and how external institutional pressure (including coercive pressure, normative pressure and mimetic pressure, though the last was not discussed in depth) promote green innovation and investigates the moderating effect of internal organizational slack by combining institutional theory and resource-based view. With the sample of China's top 100 listed companies from 2008 to 2014 and generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach, the findings supports the Porter Hypothesis that both coercive pressure and normative pressure have significant positive effects on corporate green innovation. Organizational slack positively moderates the relationship between coercive pressure and green innovation, but has no significant impact on the relationship between normative pressure and green innovation. Accordingly, the scientific value of this research is that it extends the debates on Porter Hypothesis and the role of organizational slacks. The results suggest that the government should strengthen the implementation of coercive tools, the media should play roles of “muckraking”, “catalyst” and the “vanguard” of public inquiry to insert normative pressure, and firms should rationally allocate slacks to improve green innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095101 · Cited by 38,435
Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage
Barney, J. B. (2004) · Advances in Strategic Management · doi:10.1016/s0742-3322(00)17018-4 · Cited by 38,152
Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches
Suchman, M. C. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258788 · Cited by 19,903
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550
Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers
Jensen, M. C. (1986) · Cited by 17,275
DiMaggio, P. (1983) · American Sociological Review · Cited by 9,078
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
Green and competitive: ending the stalemate
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)99997-e · Cited by 3,848
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Cited by
Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness
Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, X., Yi, N., Zhang, L., & Li, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 188
- Pages
- 304-311
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2794925690
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 73
- FWCI
- 40.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.257
- The paper
- Chen, X., Yi, N., Zhang, L., & Li, D. (2018). Does institutional pressure foster corporate green innovation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.257
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.