The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of technologies involving eco-innovation for enterprises moving towards sustainability
Abstract
Abstract In order to reach the goal of sustainability, eco-innovation has been proposed as an effective mechanism and solution to help enterprises to reduce negative impacts on environment. However, with the advance of technology, the scope of eco-innovation becomes larger and complicated. In the past, very few articles discussed the evolution of technologies involving eco-innovation integratedly and systematically. It is worth to have a systematic review concerning the state of the art. The purpose of this study was to provide a holistic view to see the progression of the technologies which pushed forward the realization of sustainability in the past 2-3 decades. In this study, 55 research review papers were initially selected and analyzed to identify the technologies involving eco-innovation. Four technology-based eco-innovation dimensions were defined (green/sustainable product development dimension, business model integration dimension, green marketing and sustainable consumption dimension, and hybrid model construction and optimization dimension). Five case studies in the prior research were re-evaluated based on the identified technology-based eco-innovation dimensions. The results showed that most companies performed the best for the green/sustainable product development dimension. New technology and directions are needed for enterprises to strengthen the other three dimensions. Therefore, additional 76 papers were analyzed to provide suggestions concerning future technology directions for enterprises moving towards sustainability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · Cited by 2,469
A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies
Gebler, M., Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M., & Visser, C. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033 · Cited by 950
Measuring circular economy strategies through index methods: A critical analysis
Elia, V., Gnoni, M. G., & Tornese, F. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.196 · Cited by 892
Morioka, S. N., & de Carvalho, M. M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.104 · Cited by 347
User‐centred design for sustainable behaviour
Wever, R., van Kuijk, J., & Boks, C. (2008) · International Journal of Sustainable Engineering · doi:10.1080/19397030802166205 · Cited by 314
Big data reduction framework for value creation in sustainable enterprises
Rehman, M. H. U., Chang, V., Batool, A., & Wah, T. Y. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.05.013 · Cited by 279
Pacheco-Blanco, B., & Bastante-Ceca, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.056 · Cited by 121
Cited by
Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review
Rosa, P., Sassanelli, C., Urbinati, A., Chiaroni, D., & Terzi, S. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896 · Cited by 733
Khan, I. S., Ahmad, M. O., & Majava, J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126655 · Cited by 489
Luthra, S., Kumar, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Mangla, S. K., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1660828 · Cited by 376
Di Vaio, A., Boccia, F., Landriani, L., & Palladino, R. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12124851 · Cited by 292
Research on international business: The new realities
Ghauri, P., Strange, R., & Cooke, F. L. (2021) · International Business Review · doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101794 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuo, T.-C., & Smith, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 192
- Pages
- 207-220
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799281036
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 4.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of technologies involving eco-innovation for enterprises moving towards sustainability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.212
- The paper
- Kuo, T.-C., & Smith, S. (2018). A systematic review of technologies involving eco-innovation for enterprises moving towards sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
