The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biosorption of rhodamine B dye from dyeing stones effluents using the green microalgae Chlorella pyrenoidosa
Abstract
Abstract Rhodamine B has been widely used in dyeing of semiprecious stones (agate), which are exported from the Southern Brazil, and in this dyeing process, colored effluents are generated. So, the objective of this study was the use green microalgae Chlorella pyrenoidosa for the removal of rhodamine B dye from dyeing stones effluents. Biosorption was carried out in order to evaluate effects of pH, contact time and temperature. Biosorption kinetics was studied for the dye concentration range of 20–500 mg L−1 using pseudo–first order, pseudo–second order and Elovich models. Equilibrium isotherms were analyzed by the Langmuir, Freundlich, Sips and Temkin models. Results showed that when the initial dye concentration was 100 mg L−1, the microalgae biomass presented the highest biosorption capacity, at pH 8.0 and temperature of 25 °C. The time required to reach the equilibrium was 120 min. The kinetic model that better fitted the experimental data was pseudo–second order, with an average relative error lesser than 2.4%. The Sips isotherm presented the best performance, being the calculated values of biosorption capacities of 63.14; 53.46 and 54.20 mg g−1 for the temperatures of 25, 35 and 45 °C respectively, demonstrating that a temperature increase has a negative effect on the biosorption capacity. Results indicated that the biosorption using Chlorella pyrenoidosa has a great potential for rhodamine B removal from dyeing stones effluents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems
Foo, K. Y., & Hameed, B. H. (2010) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 · Cited by 8,479
Removal of malachite green from aqueous solution using low-cost chlorella-based biomass
Tsai, W.-T., & Chen, H.-R. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.087 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Elgarahy, A. M., Elwakeel, K. Z., Mohammad, S. H., & Elshoubaky, G. A. (2021) · Cleaner Engineering and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.clet.2021.100209 · Cited by 686
Insight on water remediation application using magnetic nanomaterials and biosorbents
Abdel Maksoud, M. I. A., Elgarahy, A. M., Farrell, C., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., Rooney, D. W., & Osman, A. I. (2020) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213096 · Cited by 374
Biomass-Based Adsorbents for Removal of Dyes From Wastewater: A Review
Aragaw, T. A., & Bogale, F. M. (2021) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.764958 · Cited by 360
Metadata
- Authors
- da Rosa, A. L. D., Carissimi, E., Dotto, G. L., Sander, H., & Feris, L. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 198
- Pages
- 1302-1310
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2884627577
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biosorption of rhodamine B dye from dyeing stones effluents using the green microalgae Chlorella pyrenoidosa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.128
- The paper
- da Rosa, A. L. D., Carissimi, E., Dotto, G. L., Sander, H., & Feris, L. A. (2018). Biosorption of rhodamine B dye from dyeing stones effluents using the green microalgae Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.