The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Considering life-cycle environmental impacts and society's willingness for optimizing construction and demolition waste management fee: An empirical study of China
Abstract
Abstract A large amount of construction waste is generated every year over the world. Many studies indicated that waste management fee is an effective approach that could minimize the generation of waste and maximize the diversion rate of landfills. However, there are limited number of studies conducted on determining the waste management fee for construction waste. This study proposes a method to optimize the construction waste management fee by considering life-cycle environmental impacts of construction waste and society's willingness to improving the management of construction waste. This contributes to the knowledge body of construction waste management by expand the current models from these aspects. The environmental impacts taxes are selected as the evaluation basis that avoided subjective consequences in previous models. This study provides a series of suggestions for construction waste management sector in China to determining construction waste management fee, based on the findings. It is suggested that the waste management fee for 1 ton of metal waste could be 60.42 yuan (about US$9.30), followed by wood waste 38.47 yuan (about US$5.92) and masonry waste 27.65 yuan (about US$4.25). The average waste management fee for unit comprehensive construction waste of all types of buildings could be 23.61 yuan/ton (about US$3.63/ton). The average waste management fee for unit construction area (1 m2) of all types of buildings is 0.81 yuan/m2 (about US$0.12 m2). The proposed method and suggestions could be helpful for waste policy makers as well as researchers for developing construction waste management fee schemes. It worth to mention that these proposed waste management fee would vary over time and regions, as any change of factors in the calculation models would result in a change of the final result. As the application of waste management fee would affect the attitudes and behaviors of stakeholders including the government departments, owners of landfills, collection and transportation parties, waste recycling parties, landfills parties and so on. The determination of waste management fee is a very complex issue and need to be solved via systematic approaches from different perspectives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ding, Z., Yi, G., Tam, V. W. Y., & Huang, T. (2016) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.03.001 · Cited by 268
Self-citation
Cited by
Khan, S. A. R., Razzaq, A., Yu, Z., & Miller, S. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2853 · Cited by 404
RetractedRazzaq, A., Sharif, A., Najmi, A., Tseng, M.-L., & Lim, M. K. (2021) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105372 · Cited by 359
Hao, J. L., Yu, S., Tang, X., & Wu, W. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133265 · Cited by 63
Alhawamdeh, M., Ferriz-Papi, J. A., & Lee, A. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16146014 · Cited by 33
Lang, W., Chen, W., Xie, Q., Wang, P., & Zhang, G. (2025) · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05156 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Wu, H., Tam, V. W. Y., & Zuo, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 206
- Pages
- 1004-1014
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2894263856
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Considering life-cycle environmental impacts and society's willingness for optimizing construction and demolition waste management fee: An empirical study of China. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.170
- The paper
- Wang, J., Wu, H., Tam, V. W. Y., & Zuo, J. (2019). Considering life-cycle environmental impacts and society's willingness for optimizing construction and demolition waste management fee: An empirical study of China. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.170
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.