The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Performance of different coagulants in the coagulation/flocculation process of textile wastewater
Abstract
Abstract A comparative study of the efficiency of different coagulants in the textile wastewater treatment was carried out. The utilization of natural coagulants instead of the synthetic ones has demonstrated significant advantages since it provides a low cost and environmentally friendly technology for removing dyes. This study aimed at evaluating the performance of different coagulants in the removal of the apparent colour, turbidity, absorbance, and COD of textile wastewater samples from an industrial laundry. Two organic coagulants (Moringa oleifera Lam seeds extracted in saline solutions of NaCl and KCl 1 mol L−1) and an inorganic coagulant (aluminium sulphate) were used. Initially, the influence of the pH was evaluated for each coagulant. Then, a factorial design was applied in order to determine the coagulant concentration and the sedimentation time needed for the textile wastewater treatment. All the parameters obtained their best results with acidic pH values for the studied coagulants. The organic coagulants presented the best results, in general, reaching removals of 82.2% for the apparent colour, 83.05% for COD, 78.4% for RP-HE7B, and 89.7% for OP-HER using the Moringa coagulant extracted in KCl. This study demonstrated the applicability of the Moringa oleifera Lam seeds to the textile wastewater treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Standard methods: For the examination of water and waste water
(1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90598-4 · Cited by 72,091
Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments
Gunst, R. F., Myers, R. H., & Montgomery, D. C. (1996) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270613 · Cited by 9,530
Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: A review
Katheresan, V., Kansedo, J., & Lau, S. Y. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060 · Cited by 2,752
Khuri, A. I., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2010) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.73 · Cited by 2,113
Verma, A. K., Dash, R. R., & Bhunia, P. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.012 · Cited by 1,996
Sadri Moghaddam, S., Alavi Moghaddam, M. R., & Arami, M. (2010) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.058 · Cited by 697
Liang, C.-Z., Sun, S.-P., Li, F.-Y., Ong, Y.-K., & Chung, T.-S. (2014) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2014.06.057 · Cited by 525
Efficiency of the coagulation/flocculation method for the treatment of dyebath effluents
GOLOB, V, VINDER, A., & SIMONIC, M. (2005) · Dyes and Pigments · doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.11.003 · Cited by 486
Türgay, O., Ersöz, G., Atalay, S., Forss, J., & Welander, U. (2011) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.007 · Cited by 308
Removal of Congo Red dye from its aqueous solution using natural coagulants
Patel, H., & Vashi, R. T. (2012) · Journal of Saudi Chemical Society · doi:10.1016/j.jscs.2010.12.003 · Cited by 238
Cited by
Al-Tohamy, R., Ali, S. S., Li, F., Okasha, K. M., Mahmoud, Y. A.-G., Elsamahy, T., Jiao, H., Fu, Y., & Sun, J. (2022) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160 · Cited by 3,479
Samsami, S., Mohamadizaniani, M., Sarrafzadeh, M.-H., Rene, E. R., & Firoozbahr, M. (2020) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.05.034 · Cited by 1,006
Diversity of Synthetic Dyes from Textile Industries, Discharge Impacts and Treatment Methods
Slama, H. B., Chenari Bouket, A., Pourhassan, Z., Alenezi, F. N., Silini, A., Cherif-Silini, H., Oszako, T., Luptakova, L., Golińska, P., & Belbahri, L. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11146255 · Cited by 874
Biological remediation technologies for dyes and heavy metals in wastewater treatment: New insight
Singh, A., Pal, D. B., Mohammad, A., Alhazmi, A., Haque, S., Yoon, T., Srivastava, N., & Gupta, V. K. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126154 · Cited by 466
Behera, M., Nayak, J., Banerjee, S., Chakrabortty, S., & Tripathy, S. K. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105277 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Dotto, J., Fagundes-Klen, M. R., Veit, M. T., Palácio, S. M., & Bergamasco, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 208
- Pages
- 656-665
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897528678
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 15.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Performance of different coagulants in the coagulation/flocculation process of textile wastewater. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.112
- The paper
- Dotto, J., Fagundes-Klen, M. R., Veit, M. T., Palácio, S. M., & Bergamasco, R. (2019). Performance of different coagulants in the coagulation/flocculation process of textile wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
