Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on the treatment of textile industry waste effluents towards the development of efficient mitigation strategy: An integrated system design approach

Behera, Meerambika, Nayak, Jayato, Banerjee, Shirsendu, Chakrabortty, Sankha, Tripathy, Suraj K.·2021·Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering

Abstract

Abstract Amidst the exponentially growing world economy, textile industries are referred to as one of the largest contributors to the economic growth and also the biggest pollution causing production sector. The conventional methodologies for waste effluent treatment involves huge energy, time, infrastructure, material, land, manpower, and capital consumption. The presented report consists of a detailed assessment of literature review depicting the classical processes and technological innovations in the latest few decades for the degradation and abatement of dyes and other pollutants from textile waste-effluents with a proposal of a novel economic and eco-friendly cutting-edge technology. Extensive literature review on photocatalytic degradation reveals that homogeneous and heterogeneous photocatalysis could be developed as a true sustainable technology where the later one is complemented as more accomplishing in fruitful degradation of organic pollutants. But long degradation time and low degree of removal efficiencies are still major challenges to the scientific community for providing a viable treatment process. In this circumstance, hybrid process development employing pre-clarifying stage of flocculation; degradation of waste effluent employing integrated adsorbent supported photocatalyst with a membrane integrated catalyst recovery, could be the best possible solution for sustainable treatment of liquid industrial waste effluent. Final stage membrane filtration can separate out the spent catalyst along with the discharge of reusable clean water. Such a comprehensive review is expected to initiate influential policies among the research community to combat the widespread risk of reluctant treatment practices of toxic organic pollutants generated from textile industrial houses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105277

Cites

167 of 167 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 167 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Behera, M., Nayak, J., Banerjee, S., Chakrabortty, S., & Tripathy, S. K.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
105277
ISSN
  • 2213-2929 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-3437
OpenAlex
W3135759098
Cited by
365
References
167
FWCI
16.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on the treatment of textile industry waste effluents towards the development of efficient mitigation strategy: An integrated system design approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105277
The paper
Behera, M., Nayak, J., Banerjee, S., Chakrabortty, S., & Tripathy, S. K. (2021). A review on the treatment of textile industry waste effluents towards the development of efficient mitigation strategy: An integrated system design approach. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105277

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.