Systematic review on environmental innovativeness: A knowledge-based resource view
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Knowledge management helps firms acquire external information that helps them maintain sustainable goals.
“Pham et al. (2019) argued that knowledge management helps firms acquire external information that helps them maintain sustainable goals.”
From Sustainable entrepreneurship and knowledge management: Role of green information technology in building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems (2025) · cites this paper as Pham et al. (2019)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Pham, D. D. T., Paillé, P., & Halilem, N.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Pham, Do Dieu Thu
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 211
- Pages
- 1088-1099
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901153003
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
- Keywords
- green innovation, environmental management systems, green absorptive capacity, research and development, external knowledge integration, strategic networks, reciprocity norms, conceptual model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
