Cited by 38Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityEnergy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis

Characterisation and variability of greenhouse gas emissions from biomethane production via anaerobic digestion of maize

Open access
Adams, Paul W.R., McManus, Marcelle C.·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.232

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anaerobic digestion can aid in resolving international conflicts caused by GHG climatic issues or improper waste management (SDG 16).

    “Moreover, anaerobic digestion can also aid in resolving international conflicts caused by GHG climatic issues or improper waste management (Adams and McManus, 2019), which helps to achieve SDG 16.”

    From A critical review for the impact of anaerobic digestion on the sustainable development goals (2024) · cites this paper as Adams and McManus, 2019

    The available Abstract metadata lists SDGs 2 and 7, while the indexed title concerns greenhouse-gas emissions from anaerobic digestion of maize. Searches for international conflict, waste management, and SDG 16 found no passage addressing whether anaerobic digestion helps resolve conflicts; the claim cannot be verified from our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adams, P. W. R., & McManus, M. C.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Adams, Paul W.R.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
218
Pages
529-542
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906430791
Cited by
38
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Bath
  • EPSRC Supergen Bioenergy Hub (EP/J017302/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
Keywords
biomethane, anaerobic digestion, maize, greenhouse gas emissions, life cycle assessment, Renewable Energy Directive, nitrogen fertiliser, nitrous oxide emissions, fugitive methane, sensitivity analysis, emission variability, low-carbon fuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review