Cited by 200Extraction and Separation ProcessesEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Prospective LCA of the production and EoL recycling of a novel type of Li-ion battery for electric vehicles

Open access
Raugei, Marco, Winfield, Patricia·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.237

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raugei, M., & Winfield, P.
Affiliations
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Corresponding author
Raugei, Marco
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
213
Pages
926-932
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906008113
Cited by
200
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Radar (Oxford Brookes University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
MARS-EV (# 609201)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicles, battery recycling, hydrometallurgical recycling, end-of-life recovery, graphite recovery, greenhouse gas emissions, battery manufacturing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review