Cited by 97Textile materials and evaluationsDyeing and Modifying Textile FibersAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies

UV protection afforded by textile fabrics made of natural and regenerated cellulose fibres

Kocić, Ana, Bizjak, Matejka, Popović, Dusan, Poparić, Goran B., Stanković, Snežana B.·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.355

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kocić, A., Bizjak, M., Popović, D., Poparić, G. B., & Stanković, S. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
228
Pages
1229-1237
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2942733848
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • TechnoRep (University of Belgrade – Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog Razvoja (171029)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Textile materials and evaluations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
Keywords
UV protection, textile fabrics, hemp fiber, regenerated cellulose fibers, rayon, cotton, UV protection factor, knitted fabrics, fiber blending, sustainable textiles, functional textiles, yarn geometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review