The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review on the impact of mining and mineral processing industries through life cycle assessment
Open accessAbstract
This paper analysed and summarised the significant research outputs published on the environmental impact assessment of mining and mineral processing industries through life cycle assessment. The paper presents valuable insights in identifying the gaps, where should the focus be in the mining and mineral processing industries for a sustainable future. Mining and mineral processing industries have been the key focus of research in many countries due to its increasing sustainability concerns that affect global warming and climate change. Use of heavy equipment that consumes electrical energy, mechanical energy, and an enormous amount of process heat is a key contributor to the overall impacts in the industry. Due to the use of heavy equipment and associated energy consumption, these industrial sectors contribute notably to global warming, human health, ecosystems, and resources. Among the various environmental impact assessment tools which are widely used to identify sustainability indicators, life cycle assessment (LCA) is a well-justified approach among the practitioners and researchers. Though state of the art technological tools and resources are being used now a days, there is still a research gap in identifying the key mining processes which need to be the focus of attention. Renewable energy integration in the mineral processing sector and process heating from green energy sources is becoming the emergent field of research. The review results reveal, the assessment indicators in human health and ecosystems are key factors that are mostly missing in the previous studies which are crucial for people or community living nearby mining area. This review paper identifies the research gaps to the existing literature that can form the base for future research direction in the field of LCA and sustainable energy integration in mining and mineral processing industries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
(2022) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1231/1/011001 · Cited by 10,357
Indicated, N. (2010) · Joint Research Centre (European Commission) · doi:10.2788/38479 · Cited by 1,038
Assessing the environmental impact of metal production processes
Norgate, T. E., Jahanshahi, S., & Rankin, W. J. (2007) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.06.018 · Cited by 719
Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations
Norgate, T., & Haque, N. (2010) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.020 · Cited by 686
Comparative life cycle assessment of reactive MgO and Portland cement production
Ruan, S., & Unluer, C. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.071 · Cited by 383
Teh, S. H., Wiedmann, T., Castel, A., & de Burgh, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.122 · Cited by 360
Life cycle assessment of steel production in Poland: a case study
Burchart-Korol, D. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.031 · Cited by 305
Life Cycle Assessment Handbook: A Guide for Environmentally Sustainable Products
(2012) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118528372 · Cited by 294
Using sustainability reporting to assess the environmental footprint of copper mining
Northey, S., Haque, N., & Mudd, G. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.027 · Cited by 272
Solar process heat in industrial systems – A global review
Farjana, S. H., Huda, N., Mahmud, M. A. P., & Saidur, R. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.065 · Cited by 269
Self-citation
Cited by
Ren, L., Zhou, S., Peng, T., & Ou, X. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.110846 · Cited by 532
A Perspective on the Sustainability of Cathode Materials used in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Murdock, B. E., Toghill, K. E., & Tapia‐Ruiz, N. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102028 · Cited by 462
Future environmental impacts of global hydrogen production
Wei, S., Sacchi, R., Tukker, A., Suh, S., & Steubing, B. (2024) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d3ee03875k · Cited by 250
Hilson, G., & Hu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.03.010 · Cited by 104
Synthesis of high-efficient TiO2/clinoptilolite photocatalyst for complete degradation of xanthate
Shen, Y., Zhou, P., Zhao, S., Li, A., Chen, Y., Bai, J., Han, C., Wei, D., & Ao, Y. (2020) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2020.106640 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Farjana, S. H., Huda, N., Parvez Mahmud, M. A., & Saidur, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 231
- Pages
- 1200-1217
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946857610
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review on the impact of mining and mineral processing industries through life cycle assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.264
- The paper
- Farjana, S. H., Huda, N., Parvez Mahmud, M. A., & Saidur, R. (2019). A review on the impact of mining and mineral processing industries through life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.