Cited by 686Environmental Impact and SustainabilityMining Techniques and EconomicsMineral Processing and Grinding

Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations

Norgate, T., Haque, N.·2010·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.020

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norgate, T., & Haque, N.
Affiliations
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Norgate, T.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
266-274
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113231897
Cited by
686
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 76 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Mining Techniques and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mineral Processing and Grinding
Keywords
mining, mineral processing, greenhouse gas emissions, embodied energy, iron ore, bauxite, copper concentrate, crushing and grinding, ore grade decline, high-pressure grinding rolls, stirred ball mill, diesel engine technology, life cycle assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review