Assessing the potential of soil carbonation and enhanced weathering through Life Cycle Assessment: A case study for Sao Paulo State, Brazil
Open accessAbstract
Enhanced silicate rock weathering for long-term carbon dioxide sequestration has considerable potential, but depends on the availability of suitable rocks coupled with proximity to suitable locations for field application. In this paper, we investigate the established mining industry that extracts basaltic rocks for construction from the Paraná Basin, Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Through a Life Cycle Assessment, we determine the balance of carbon dioxide emissions involved in the use of this material, the relative contribution of soil carbonation and enhanced weathering, and the potential carbon dioxide removal of Sao Paulo agricultural land through enhanced weathering of basalt rock. Our results show that enhanced weathering and carbonation respectively emit around 75 and 135 kg carbon dioxide equivalent per tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent removed (considering a quarry to field distance of 65 km). We underline transportation as the principal process negatively affecting the practice and uncover a limiting road travel distance from the quarry to the field of 540 ± 65 km for carbonation and 990 ± 116 km for enhanced weathering, above which the emissions offset the potential capture. Regarding Sao Paulo State, the application of crushed basalt at 1 t/ha to all of the State's 12 million hectares of agricultural land could capture around 1.3 to 2.4 Mt carbon dioxide equivalent through carbonation and enhanced weathering, respectively. This study suggests a lower sequestration estimate than previous studies and emphasizes the need to consider all process stages through a Life Cycle Assessment methodology, to provide more reliable estimates of the sequestration potential of greenhouse gas removal technologies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The capture rate is approximately 0.11-0.2 tCO2e per ton of basaltic rock applied.
“Furthermore, the results suggest a capture rate of approximately 0.11-0.2tCO 2 e/ton of basaltic rock applied (Lefebvre et al. 2019).”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Lefebvre et al. 2019
Enhanced weathering operation emits 75 kg CO2 per ton of CO2 removed and carbonation emits 135 kg CO2 per ton of CO2 removed, based on a distance of 65 km between production site and field.
“The investigation presented several key findings, first, that the operation emits 75 kg of CO 2 per ton of CO 2 removed through enhanced weathering and 135 kg of CO 2 per ton of CO 2 removed through carbonation.This is based on a distance of 65 km between the production site and the field on which the ground rock is applied.”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Lefebvre et al. 2019
Maximum road travel distance is 540 km for carbonation and 990 km for enhanced weathering, above which emissions offset potential benefits.
“The results indicate a maximum road travel distance of 540 km for carbonation and 990 km for enhanced weathering, above which the emissions offset the potential benefits realized from such activity.”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Lefebvre et al. 2019
Transportation is a major drawback which places limitations on the potential viability of enhanced weathering.
“It is concluded that transportation is a major drawback which places limitations on the potential viability of this technology.”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Lefebvre et al. 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 153
- Authors
- Lefebvre, D., Goglio, P., Williams, A., Manning, D. A. C., de Azevedo, A. C., Bergmann, M., Meersmans, J., & Smith, P.
- Affiliations
- Cranfield University (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Serviço Geológico do Brasil - CPRM (BR)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lefebvre, David
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 233
- Pages
- 468-481
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2951965408
- Semantic Scholar
- 66f1e31ee326e717c20bedfd3108541ad0611b15
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 5.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Keywords
- CO2 sequestration, carbon dioxide removal, basalt, crushed basalt, mining industry, transport emissions, agricultural land, Paraná Basin, São Paulo state
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review