Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis

Feng, Yanchao, Wang, Xiaohong, Du, Wenchao, Wu, Hongyu, Wang, Jintao·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract As for the academics and policymakers, more attention has been given to the issue on how to drive urban innovation through the cooperation of environmental regulation and FDI. With the use of a city-level panel data of 285 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2017, this study preliminary explores the impacts of environmental regulation, FDI, and its interaction term on urban innovation at national and regional levels. Specifically, based on the spatial Durbin model under the space-and-time fixed effect, three different spatial weight matrixes (i.e. the first-order adjacency, the inverse distance, and the economic distance) are utilized to check the robustness of the results under different standards. The results indicate that the impacts of FDI and environmental regulation on urban innovation have not achieved the desired goal without the other's cooperation, while most of its interaction term's coefficients on urban innovation are significantly positive, which provides robust support for the establishment of “Porter hypothesis” in China. Moreover, spatial heterogeneity is established, and the uneven development of urban innovation among different regions deserves more attention. In order to effectively increase the ability of urban innovation in China, the government should focus on such solutions as enhancing the implementation and supervision efficiency of environmental regulation, optimizing the structure of FDI, improving the synergistic effects of environmental regulation and FDI, and establishing a multi-scale spatial cooperation mechanism based on both geographical and economic correlations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.184

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Metadata

Authors
Feng, Y., Wang, X., Du, W., Wu, H., & Wang, J.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
235
Pages
210-224
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949094895
Cited by
253
References
27
FWCI
38.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.184
The paper
Feng, Y., Wang, X., Du, W., Wu, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.