The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis
Abstract
Abstract As for the academics and policymakers, more attention has been given to the issue on how to drive urban innovation through the cooperation of environmental regulation and FDI. With the use of a city-level panel data of 285 Chinese cities from 2003 to 2017, this study preliminary explores the impacts of environmental regulation, FDI, and its interaction term on urban innovation at national and regional levels. Specifically, based on the spatial Durbin model under the space-and-time fixed effect, three different spatial weight matrixes (i.e. the first-order adjacency, the inverse distance, and the economic distance) are utilized to check the robustness of the results under different standards. The results indicate that the impacts of FDI and environmental regulation on urban innovation have not achieved the desired goal without the other's cooperation, while most of its interaction term's coefficients on urban innovation are significantly positive, which provides robust support for the establishment of “Porter hypothesis” in China. Moreover, spatial heterogeneity is established, and the uneven development of urban innovation among different regions deserves more attention. In order to effectively increase the ability of urban innovation in China, the government should focus on such solutions as enhancing the implementation and supervision efficiency of environmental regulation, optimizing the structure of FDI, improving the synergistic effects of environmental regulation and FDI, and establishing a multi-scale spatial cooperation mechanism based on both geographical and economic correlations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties
Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & James Chu, C.-S. (2002) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7 · Cited by 12,849
Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models
Anselin, L. (1988) · Studies in Operational Regional Science · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1 · Cited by 9,274
A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631 · Cited by 7,460
Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study
Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465397557196 · Cited by 2,181
Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the Bar
Elhorst, J. P. (2010) · Spatial Economic Analysis · doi:10.1080/17421770903541772 · Cited by 1,710
Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels
Elhorst, J. P. (2014) · SpringerBriefs in Regional Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40340-8 · Cited by 908
(2004) · The Countries of the Former Soviet Union at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century · doi:10.4324/9780203647547-34 · Cited by 725
Ren, S., Li, X., Yuan, B., Li, D., & Chen, X. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.113 · Cited by 683
Zhang, C., & Zhou, X. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.226 · Cited by 618
Cited by
Qiu, S., Wang, Z., & Geng, S. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112282 · Cited by 299
Liu, Y., Liu, S., Shao, X., & He, Y. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111779 · Cited by 204
Liu, W., Shen, J., & Wei, Y. D. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116501 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, Y., Wang, X., Du, W., Wu, H., & Wang, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 235
- Pages
- 210-224
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2949094895
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 38.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.184
- The paper
- Feng, Y., Wang, X., Du, W., Wu, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Effects of environmental regulation and FDI on urban innovation in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.184
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.