Cited by 299Energy, Environment, Economic GrowthInternational Business and FDIEfficiency Analysis Using DEA

How do environmental regulation and foreign investment behavior affect green productivity growth in the industrial sector? An empirical test based on Chinese provincial panel data

Qiu, Shilei, Wang, Zilong, Geng, Shuaishuai·2021·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of environmental regulations (ERs) and foreign direct investment (FDI) on the green total factor productivity (GTFP) of the industrial sectors in 30 provinces in China by controlling human capital, technological innovation, energy structure, degree of opening up, and ownership structure for the period of 2004-2017. This not only helps to explain the influence path of ERs and FDI on green economic growth, but also effectively measures the moderating effect of ERs on technology spillover from FDI. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between ERs, FDI and industrial GTFP from the perspective of regional heterogeneity, focusing on studying how ERs regulate the impact of FDI on GTFP. By constructing an influence mechanism of ERs and FDI on industrial GTFP, this study employs the feasible generalized least squares (FGLS) model and dynamic generalized method of moments (GMM) model to analyze the effects of ERs, FDI and their cross-terms on GTFP. The empirical results show that (1) the relationship between ERs and GTFP is not linear, but "U"-shaped and China is still in the left half of the "U"-shaped curve; (2) FDI flowing into China has a "pollution heaven" effect on the GTFP in the eastern and central regions while a "pollution halo" effect on the GTFP in the western region; (3) the strengthening of ERs weakens the negative effect of FDI on GTFP and plays a role in "screening" foreign investment; and (4) the spatial heterogeneity could affect the synergistic effect between ERs and FDI. Therefore, it is necessary for China to consider a series of environmental policies to "screen" inward FDI to ensure its move to a green economy benefits its own sustainable development by contributing to the increase in GTFP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112282

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qiu, S., Wang, Z., & Geng, S.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
  • Henan Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Geng, Shuaishuai
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
287
Pages
112282
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135668414
Cited by
299
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 19
FWCI
44.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Keywords
environmental regulation, foreign direct investment, green total factor productivity, manufacturing industry, pollution haven effect, pollution halo effect, technology spillovers, moderating effect, screening effects, spatial heterogeneity, green economy, China
MeSH terms
China, Environmental Pollution, Humans, Industry, Investments, Internationality, Economic Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review