Cited by 302Organic Food and AgricultureConsumer behavior in food and healthEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Ethical consumption intentions and choice behavior towards organic food. Moderation role of buying and environmental concerns

Kushwah, Shiksha, Dhir, Amandeep, Sagar, Mahim·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.350

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Kushwah, S., Dhir, A., & Sagar, M.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
  • North-West University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Kushwah, Shiksha
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
236
Pages
117519
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955650148
Cited by
302
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 3
FWCI
20.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
Aalto-Yliopisto
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
organic food, consumer choice, theory of consumption values, epistemic value, social values, emotional value, functional value, price value, environmental concern

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review