Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 942

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review

Li, Jiayan, Wang, Jinman·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract The amount of coal gangue, a by-product of coal mining and washing, is rapidly increasing with the growing trend of energy consumption. The accumulated coal gangue without appropriate utilization has resulted in a squander of resources, waste disposal and environmental pollution issues. Over the past few decades, there has been wide attention in developing strategies for the utilization of coal gangue due to a cultural shift towards sustainable development coupled with increasing demand for disposing the challenge of coal gangue accumulation. However, to our knowledge, there is no thorough and in-depth review on the series address of coal gangue reuse. In spite of some advantages of using coal gangue, it is notable that negative environmental problems cannot be ignored, so the scientific utilization is necessary to control the environmental impacts. Therefore, the main objective of this paper is to provide a comprehensive literature review of coal gangue utilization in building material production, energy generation, soil improvement and other high-added applications, analyze the worldwide dynamics of the studies on coal gangue utilization and identify the potential environmental risks in various pathways. The key focus of the review is on detecting the potential problems and thus giving recommendations for the solution. In addition, based on the progress of previous research, this paper also points the directions for further research within the field. A bibliometric analysis was developed in China National Knowledge Internet and Web of Science and a systematic review was conducted for related 237 articles to understand the physicochemical properties and utilization characteristics of coal gangue as well as corresponding environmental risks. The results indicated that the number of published articles has increased in recent years, and the researches were mainly from China, with the contribution of 78.94% of the total selected publications. Besides, these researches mainly focused on the utilization of coal gangue, while there was a lack of attention to environmental risks. The findings of the present study open up a new gate for the further application in coal gangue, hopefully motivate future relevant studies and guide the policy-making.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117946

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, J., & Wang, J.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
239
Pages
117946
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966357580
Cited by
942
References
0
FWCI
29.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117946
The paper
Li, J., & Wang, J. (2019). Comprehensive utilization and environmental risks of coal gangue: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117946

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.