CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Economic rationalism or administrative rationalism? Curbside collection systems in Sweden and Japan

Takahashi, Wakana·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118288
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118288

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Andersson, 2018, Direct and indirect effects of waste management policies on household waste behaviour: the case of Sweden, Waste Manag., 76, 19, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.03.038 · DOI
  2. Asano, 2013, vol. 14, 9
  3. Brunklaus, 2018, The future of Swedish food waste: an environmental assessment of existing and prospective valorization techniques, J. Clean. Prod., 202, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.240 · DOI
  4. Corvellec, 2012, The business model of solid waste management in Sweden–a case study of two municipally-owned companies, Waste Manag. Res., 30, 512, 10.1177/0734242X11427944 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Dahlén, 2010, Evaluation of recycling programmes in household waste collection systems, Waste Manag. Res., 28, 577, 10.1177/0734242X09341193 · DOI
  6. Díaz-Siefer, 2015, Human-environment system knowledge: a correlate of pro-environmental behavior, Sustainability, 7, 15510, 10.3390/su71115510 · DOI
  7. Ek, 2018, Behavioral spillovers from food-waste collection in Swedish municipalities, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 89, 168, 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.01.004 · DOI
  8. Fujinami, 1997, By public information, enlightenment activity uplift of the inhabitants awareness, Public Welf., 52, 26
  9. Gaidajis, 2010, E-waste: environmental problems and current management, J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev., 3, 193, 10.25103/jestr.031.32 · DOI
  10. Hirose, 1985, Determinants of environment-conscious behavior, Res. Soc. Psychol., 10, 44
  11. Hungerford, 1990, Changing learner behavior thorugh environmental education, J. Environ. Educ., 21, 8
  12. Kaiser, 2003, Ecological behavior's dependency on different forms of knowledge, Appl. Psychol., 52, 598, 10.1111/1464-0597.00153 · DOI
  13. Katsutani, 1992, Special issues: the present status and trends of waste-related laws. Law for the promotion of utilization of recycled resources, Waste Manag. Res., 3, 104, 10.3985/wmr.3.104 · DOI
  14. Kobayashi, 2006, From waste disposal law to sound-material recycling society fundamental law: history and overlook for future, J. Jpn. Waste Manag. Assoc., 59, 315
  15. Kurasaka, 2003, On designer responsibility principle: the cost sharing principle for environmental problems caused by artificial materials, Econ. J. Chiba Univ., 18, 69
  16. Kurishima, 2002, Domestic waste collection service and regional characteristics of municipalities in the Nagoya region, Geogr. Rev. Jpn., 75, 69, 10.4157/grj.75.69 · DOI
  17. Kurita, 2009, The new cost-sharing system under the containers and packaging recycling law, Environ. Econ. Policy Res., 2, 35
  18. Kurosawa, 2005, A case of the coexistence of humans and crows: a town with decrease of waste dispersion (Chofu-shi, Tokyo), STRIX, 23, 125
  19. Kurosawa, 2003, Conflict between humans and crows in Greater Tokyo: garbage management as a possible solution, Glob. Environ. Res., 7, 139
  20. Machida, 1970, Paradox of separate collection and recycling, Mem. Chūō Acad. Res. Inst., 42, 137
  21. Miki, 2001, The extent of the public/private sector involvement in garbage disposal, Rev. Econ. Bus. Manag., 29, 29
  22. Miliute-Plepiene, 2015, Does food sorting prevents and improves sorting of household waste? A case in Sweden, J. Clean. Prod., 101, 182, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.013 · DOI
  23. Okamoto, 2016, Actual conditions of garbage collection sites and evaluation by users in detached house area: basic study to realize the beautiful and comfortable detached house area, J. Archit. Plan. Environ. Eng., 81, 1019
  24. Onuma, 2002, How did the citizen perceive a troublesome classification system? System evaluation by the Nagoya citizens, J. Jpn. Soc. Waste Manag. Expert., 13, 81
  25. Otsuka, 1998, Moot points of the new recycling law and a propasal for a framework comprehensive law pertaining to waste management and recycling in Japan, Waste Manag. Res., 9, 413, 10.3985/wmr.9.413 · DOI
  26. Otsuka, 2006, The evaluation of the container and packaging recycling law and future tasks, Waste Manag. Res., 17, 166, 10.3985/wmr.17.166 · DOI
  27. Otto, 2018, The economy of e-waste collection at the individual level: a practice oriented approach of categorizing determinants of e-waste collection into behavioral costs and motivation, J. Clean. Prod., 204, 33, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.293 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ouellette, 1998, Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior, Psychol. Bull., 124, 54, 10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Reinius, 2012, School education on the environment and green tourism in Swedish style, J. Dev. Sci. Res. Miyagi Gakuin Women Univ., 12, 93
  30. Rousta, 2015, Quantitative assessment of distance to collection point and improved sorting information on source separation of household waste, Waste Manag., 40, 22, 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.03.005 · DOI
  31. Rousta, 2017, Support for designing waste sorting systems: a mini review, Waste Manag. Res., 35, 1099, 10.1177/0734242X17726164 · DOI
  32. Sakai, 2008, Unit-charging programs for municipal solid waste in Japan, Waste Manag., 28, 2815, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.07.010 · DOI
  33. Shiiya, 2008, A case study of circumstances of garbage collection sites' form, location and condition of residual garbage, Pap. Environ. Inf. Sci., 22, 275
  34. Shimizu, 2001, A study of environmental education through school and community systems in Sweden: with a focus on outdoor education, J. Dep. Educ. Stud. Hiroshima Univ., 2, 33
  35. Tabata, 2015, Heat and electricity supply from municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration plants in Japan: the current situation and issues for the future, Proc. Jpn. Inst. Energy, 24, 252
  36. Takahashi, 2011, Food waste separate collection/recycling systems in Swedish urban area, J. Fac. Int. Stud. Utsunomiya Univ., 31, 117
  37. Takahashi, 2013, Transformation of household waste separation and collection in Sweden: how has convenience been taken into account?, J. Fac. Int. Stud. Utsunomiya Univ., 35, 57
  38. Takahashi, 2014, Household recyclable waste sorting and collection system: policy development and implimentation in Sweden, Environ. Econ. Policy Res., 8, 99
  39. Takahashi, 2016, An actor analysis of the rapid rise of well-equipped curbside recycling systems in Sweden, J. Fac. Int. Stud. Utsunomiya Univ., 41, 51
  40. Takahashi, 2018, Governance issues in policy integration for waste energy use: a comparison of case studies of Jaapn and Sweden, Environ. Econ. Policy Res., 11, 39
  41. Takahashi, 2018, Decrease of housewife citizen and the user-friendly household waste classification and collection system: a comparison of Japan and Sweden, Environ. Econ. Policy Res., 11, 50
  42. Takahashi, 2010, Development trajectories of waste and resource management policies : a comparative analysis of Japan and Korea, J. Fac. Int. Stud. Utsunomiya Univ., 29, 49
  43. Takahashi, 2013, Waste sorting/disposal habits in Swedish households: relations with facilities, gender and knowledge of waste treatment, J. Fac. Int. Stud. Utsunomiya Univ., 36, 1
  44. Takami, 2009, Environmental education of Sweden as a environmentally advanced country, Toshi Seiso, 62, 119
  45. Tanaka, 1995, The conditions of the recycle social system: on the general waste in big cities, Econ. Manag., 26, 185
  46. Tasaki, 2014, A harmful influence of shared responsibility in recycling system and significance of the goal seting, Environ. Econ. Policy Res., 8, 78
  47. Ueda, 1977, A research study about regional development and welfare in Osaka Metropolitan Area: problems of welfare in the Large City, Compr. Res. Inst. Bull., 3, 1
  48. Wada, 2004, A study for dumping charge system, Stud. Commun. Dev., 31
  49. Werner, 2017, District heating and cooling in Sweden, Energy, 126, 419, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.052 · DOI
  50. Yamakawa, 2006, Reassessment of the containers and packaging recycling law issues concerning the revision of the containers and packaging recycling law and extended producer responsibility, Waste Manag. Res., 17, 174, 10.3985/wmr.17.174 · DOI
  51. Yorifuji, 2005, Effects of prior voluntary recycling on social acceptance of mandatory resource separation system, J. Jpn. Soc.Waste Manag. Expert., 16, 55, 10.3985/jswme.16.55 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Takahashi, W.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
242
Pages
118288
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118288
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26301014)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review