Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 632

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interaction between Chlorella vulgaris and nitrifying-enriched activated sludge in the treatment of wastewater with low C/N ratio

Sepehri, Arsalan, Sarrafzadeh, Mohammad-Hossein, Avateffazeli, Maryam·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Wastewater treatment based on algae-bacteria consortia is expected to find use among other biological processes. In this report, the effects of the inoculation ratios of a Chlorella vulgaris and nitrifier-enriched-activated-sludge (NAS) consortium on nutrient removal, carbon capture, and metabolite generation were investigated under autotrophic conditions. The maximum NH4+-N removal (100%) was observed within 7 days in a photo-bioreactor containing 10% C. vulgaris: 90% NAS (w/w); this consortium is referred to as B10. The maximum PO43--P removal (87.5%) was observed in a pure culture of C. vulgaris after 14 days. Due to the fast nitrification achieved using B10, this system showed the highest nitrate accumulation value of 19.73 mg NO3−-N/L at the end of the experiment. The DO concentration in B10 reached 4 mg/L due to the photosynthetic activity of C. vulgaris, providing appropriate conditions for the NAS. Among all the tested consortium ratios, B90 (90%:10% C. vulgaris/NAS, w/w) showed the highest carbon capture (156 mg), while B10 captured only 43.2 mg of carbon. Furthermore, metabolite analysis showed a positive correlation between the proportion of C. vulgaris and the generation of metabolites in the cultures. A trade-off was observed between nutrient removal and carbon capture in C. vulgaris and NAS co-cultures. Overall, our study shows that the aeration system in conventional nitrification processes could be replaced by a cleaner process based on microalgae, resulting in enhanced nutrient removal, increased carbon capture, reduced metabolite generation, and a decrease in excess sludge production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119164

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 632

Metadata

Authors
Sepehri, A., Sarrafzadeh, M.-H., & Avateffazeli, M.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
247
Pages
119164
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2985887729
Cited by
632
References
4
FWCI
16.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction between Chlorella vulgaris and nitrifying-enriched activated sludge in the treatment of wastewater with low C/N ratio. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119164
The paper
Sepehri, A., Sarrafzadeh, M.-H., & Avateffazeli, M. (2020). Interaction between Chlorella vulgaris and nitrifying-enriched activated sludge in the treatment of wastewater with low C/N ratio. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119164

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.