Cited by 151Municipal Solid Waste ManagementWaste Management and RecyclingSustainable Supply Chain Management

A systematic review of the deposit-refund system for beverage packaging: Operating mode, key parameter and development trend

Zhou, Guangli, Gu, Yifan, Wu, Yufeng, Gong, Yu, Mu, Xianzhong, Han, Honggui, Chang, Tao·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119660

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, G., Gu, Y., Wu, Y., Gong, Y., Mu, X., Han, H., & Chang, T.
Affiliations
Beijing University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Yufeng
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
251
Pages
119660
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996237813
Cited by
151
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Basic Research Program of China (2017YFC0703206-03, 2018YFC1902706)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
deposit-refund systems, beverage packaging, extended producer responsibility, packaging recycling, material flow, sustainable design, circular business models, Internet of Things, informal recycling, Germany, Sweden, South Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review