The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Addressing the design-implementation gap of sustainable business models by prototyping: A tool for planning and executing small-scale pilots
Open accessAbstract
Next to the redesign of industrial products and processes, sustainable business model innovation is a strategic approach to integrate environmental and social concerns into the objectives and operations of organizations. One of the major challenges of this approach is that many promising business model ideas fail to reach the market, which is needed to achieve impact. In the literature, the issue is referred to as a “design-implementation gap.” This paper explores how that critical gap may be bridged. In doing so, we contribute to sustainable business model innovation theory and practice. We contribute to theory by connecting sustainable business model innovation with business experimentation and strategic design, two innovation approaches that leverage prototyping as a way to iteratively implement business ideas early on. Using a design science research methodology, we combine theoretical insights from these three literatures into a tool for setting up small-scale pilots of sustainable business models. We apply, evaluate, and improve our tool through a rigorous process by working with nine startups and one multinational company. As a result, we provide normative theory in terms of the sustainable business model innovation process, explaining that piloting a prototype forces organizations to simultaneously consider the desirability (i.e., what users want), feasibility (i.e., what is technically achievable), viability (i.e., what is financially possible), and sustainability (i.e., what is economically, socially and environmentally acceptable) of a new business model. Doing so early on is functional to bridge the design-implementation gap of sustainable business models. We contribute to practice with the tool itself, which organizations can use to translate sustainable business model ideas defined “on paper” into small-scale pilots as a first implementation step. We encourage future research building on the limitations of this exploratory study by working with a larger sample of companies through longitudinal case studies, to further explain how these pilots can be executed successfully.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240302 · Cited by 7,832 · cited 6×
“This study uses a design science research (DSR) methodology (Peffers et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPartnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st‐century business
Elkington, J. (1998) · Environmental Quality Management · doi:10.1002/tqem.3310080106 · Cited by 5,341 · cited 2×
“…future (Brundtland, 1987), in our business context, we refer to it more narrowly as embedding a multistakeholder perspective, triple-bottom-line (people-planet-profit) thinking, and impact assessment orientation into business objectives and operations (Elkington, 1998; Stubbs and Cocklin, 2008).”
BackgroundBusiness model innovation: Opportunities and barriers
Chesbrough, H. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 · Cited by 3,850
Wicked Problems in Design Thinking
Buchanan, R. (1992) · Design Issues · doi:10.2307/1511637 · Cited by 3,539 · cited 1×
“The origins of strategic design connect to design literature as a rational process to solve complex problems (Buchanan, 1992; Simon, 1973).”
BackgroundBusiness models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda
Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 · Cited by 2,469
Eight types of product–service system: Eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet
Tukker, A. (2004) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.414 · Cited by 2,456
Lean Thinking—Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600967 · Cited by 2,122
Understanding and Tackling Societal Grand Challenges through Management Research
George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2016.4007 · Cited by 2,021
The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application
Dorst, K. (2011) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006 · Cited by 1,897
Business models: A discovery driven approach
McGrath, R. G. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.005 · Cited by 1,146
Cited by
Sharing economy business models for sustainability
Curtis, S. K., & Mont, O. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121519 · Cited by 282
Hofstetter, J. S., De Marchi, V., Sarkis, J., Govindan, K., Klassen, R., Ometto, A. R., Spraul, K. S., Bocken, N., Ashton, W. S., Sharma, S., et al. (2021) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-021-00015-2 · Cited by 174
Self-citationDesign thinking for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis and case study research
Leal Filho, W., Schmidberger, I., Sharifi, A., Vargas, V. R., Rampasso, I. S., Dibbern, T., Liakh, O., Aina, Y. A., Trevisan, L. V., Mbah, M. F., et al. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142285 · Cited by 27
Abdelkafi, N., Xu, J., Pero, M., Ciccullo, F., & Masi, A. (2023) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-023-01140-0 · Cited by 27
Experimentation capability for a circular economy: a practical guide
Bocken, N., & Konietzko, J. (2023) · Journal of Business Strategy · doi:10.1108/jbs-02-2022-0039 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldassarre, B., Konietzko, J., Brown, P., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N., Karpen, I. O., & Hultink, E. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 255
- Pages
- 120295
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000967989
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 26.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Addressing the design-implementation gap of sustainable business models by prototyping: A tool for planning and executing small-scale pilots. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120295
- The paper
- Baldassarre, B., Konietzko, J., Brown, P., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N., Karpen, I. O., & Hultink, E. J. (2020). Addressing the design-implementation gap of sustainable business models by prototyping: A tool for planning and executing small-scale pilots. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120295
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.