Cited by 43Environmental Impact and SustainabilityWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesExtraction and Separation Processes

Life cycle assessment considering water-energy nexus for lithium nanofiltration extraction technique

Open access
Li, Baolan, Wu, Jun, Lu, Jian·2020·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nanofiltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nanofiltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nanofiltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nanofiltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidification potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nanofiltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofiltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet>Inner Mongolia>Sinkiang>Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121152

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 24 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Information on LCA of lithium extraction is still limited.

    “Although the environmental impact of conventional lithium extraction methods has been paid attention (Flexer et al., 2018; Jiang et al., 2020), information on LCA of lithium extraction is still limited.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Flexer et al., 2018 source
    • cites Jiang et al., 2020 source
  • Findingown data
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    The environmental emission of this process followed the order CO2 > SO2 > CH4 > NOX > CO > PM10 > VOC > N2O.

    “The environmental emission of this process followed the order of CO2 > SO2 > CH4 > NOX > CO > PM10 > VOC > N2O.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    The nanofiltration stage contributed 51.84% of POCP.

    “Nanofi ltration stage contributed to 48.79% of GWP, 50.52% of AP, 51.84% of POCP, 50.49% of NE, and 39.36% of SA, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    GWP values were 1.56×10^-2, 1.08×10^-2, and 2.59×10^-3 kg CO2 eq at nanofiltration, hyperfiltration, and electrodialysis stages, respectively.

    “GWP was the highest index in the lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with 1.56 -10 2 , 1.08 -10 2 , and 2.59 -10 3 kg CO2 eq at nano fi ltration, hyper fi ltration and electrodialysis stages, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    The nanofiltration stage accounted for the largest proportion of AP, with 7.85×10^-5 kg SO2 eq.

    “Compared with the other stages, nano fi ltration stage accounted for the largest proportion with 7.85 -10 5 kg SO2 eq for AP, 5.5 -10 5 kg NOX eq for NE, and 1.51 -10 5 kg PM10 for SA, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • May combine two claims. 33
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Water-energy nexus analysis

    New technologies for lithium recovery from brines have been widely explored.

    “Therefore, new technologies for lithium recovery from brines have been widely explored (Flexer et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Flexer et al., 2018 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    POCP reached 2.21×10^-6, 1.52×10^-6, and 3.65×10^-6 kg C2H4 eq at nanofiltration, hyperfiltration, and electrodialysis stages, respectively.

    “POCP reached 2.21 -10 6 , 1.52 -10 6 , and 3.65 -10 6 kg C2H4 eq at nano fi ltration, hyper fi ltration and electrodialysis stages, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    Steam loss and dust generation during evaporation and dry processes were components of the environmental load.

    “Moreover, steam loss and dust generation during evaporation and dry processes were also considered as components of the environmental load.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    Environmental emission at the nanofiltration stage was the largest, followed by the hyperfiltration stage.

    “Environmental emission at the nano fi ltration stage was the largest, and then followed by that at hyper fi ltration stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    The nanofiltration stage accounted for the largest proportion of NE, with 5.5×10^-5 kg NOX eq.

    “Compared with the other stages, nano fi ltration stage accounted for the largest proportion with 7.85 -10 5 kg SO2 eq for AP, 5.5 -10 5 kg NOX eq for NE, and 1.51 -10 5 kg PM10 for SA, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential.

    “Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Water and energy consumption of the nanofiltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively.

    “The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    The main energy consumption of the nanofiltration extraction process was electricity, and auxiliary devices such as high-pressure pumps consumed large amounts of energy.

    “The main energy consumption of nano fi ltration extraction process was electricity and some auxiliary devices such as high-pressure pumps were used to consume lots of energy.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 2. Nanofi ltration extraction of lithium from salt-lake brine

    The raw brine from a salt lake in Qinghai Province had lithium concentration 0.58 g/L and magnesium concentration 5.68 g/L.

    “The concentration of lithium and magnesium in the raw brine was 0.58 and 5.68 g/L, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD, with internal cost accounting for 99.99%.

    “The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2. Life cycle cost analysis

    The cost of precipitation reached 17 USD, accounting for 94.41% of internal cost during the whole process, although this stage produced little environmental load and emission.

    “The cost of the precipitation reached 17 USD to account for 94.41% of internal cost during the whole process although this stage only produced a little environmental load and emission.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    The total LCC was 18.01 USD, with LCCIn accounting for 99.99%.

    “The total LCC was 18.01 USD with LCCIn accounting for 99.99%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.4. Water-energy nexus analysis

    The electricity consumption cost for producing 1 t Li2CO3 in Sinkiang, Inner Mongolia, Qinghai and Tibet were 1028.58, 978.1, 1104.18 and 1321.38 USD, respectively.

    “The electricity consumption cost for producing 1 t Li2CO3 in Sinkiang, Inner Mongolia, Qinghai and Tibet were 1028.58, 978.1, 1104.18 and 1321.38 USD, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    The total water consumption reached 546.51 L for producing 1 kg Li2CO3, with direct water consumption in the production process of 523.55 L, which was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption.

    “The total water consumption reached 546.51 L for producing 1 kg Li2CO3 with the direct water consumption in the production process of 523.55 L that was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.4. Water-energy nexus analysis

    The water and electricity consumption for producing 1 t Li2CO3 reached 546.51 t and 8674 Kwh, respectively.

    “The water and electricity consumption for producing 1 t Li2CO3 reached 546.51 t and 8674 Kwh, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    Electricity and water expenditure covered 3.9% and 1.7% of total internal cost, respectively.

    “Electricity and water expenditure covered 3.9% and 1.7% of total internal cost, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    Water containing concentrated Mg2+ after the separation process accounted for 54% of the total water, was not involved in further process, and was used for further magnesium extraction.

    “Water containing concentrated Mg 2 þ after separation process accounting for 54% of the total water was not involved in further process and was used for further magnesium extraction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    Water consumption at the nanofiltration stage accounted for 98.05% of total water consumption, and energy consumption at the nanofiltration stage accounted for 53.95% of total energy consumption.

    “Water/energy consumption at nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05%/53.95% of corresponding total consumption.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    180.83/59.35 L of solutions with low ion content were separated at hyperfiltration/electrodialysis stage, accounting for 33.09%/10.86% of the direct water consumption.

    “In addition, 180.83/59.35 L of solutions with low ion content were separated at hyper fi ltration/electrodialysis stage, accounting for 33.09%/10.86% of the direct water consumption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    The cost of water, Na2CO3 and electricity in LCCIn reached 0.31, 17, and 0.68 USD, respectively.

    “The cost of water, Na2CO3 and electricity in LCCIn reached 0.31, 17, and 0.68 USD, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    Extraction of 1 kg Li2CO3 requires more than 500 L fresh water for dilution and large quantity of energy is consumed in the nanofiltration, hyperfiltration and electrodialysis stages.

    “Extraction of 1 kg Li2CO3 requires more than 500 L fresh water for dilution and large quantity of energy is consumed in the nano fi ltration, hyperfi ltration and electrodialysis stages based on the investigation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Raw brine must be diluted before nanofiltration membrane separation to prevent membrane fouling.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    Na2CO3 used in this study was industrial grade with purity of 99% and its price was relatively high.

    “Na2CO3 used in this study was industrial grade with purity of 99% and its price was relatively high.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    A little water and no electricity were consumed at the MVR evaporation stage.

    “A little water and no electricity were consumed at MVR evaporation stage.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Life cycle cost analysis

    A hybrid assessment of LCA and LCC for ceramic tile production showed that the total cost of $2.77/m2 was mainly caused by raw material use and that enhancing resource utilization efficiency was effective for decreasing environmental cost in that industry.

    “A hybrid assessment of LCA and LCC for ceramic tile production was performed to show that the total cost of $2.77/m2 was mainly caused by the use of raw materials and enhancement of resource utilization ef fi ciency was effective for decreasing the environmental cost in this industry (Ye et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ye et al., 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    The widely used methods for extracting lithium from salt-lake brines (precipitation, ion-exchange, liquid-liquid extraction) are relatively simple but consume relatively high chemical reagents and energy.

    “These methods are relatively simple while the consumption of chemical reagents and energy is relatively high (Swain, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Swain, 2017 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    A previous LCA study of water treatment plants reported that a treatment plant with a nanofiltration unit exerted less environmental impact than a conventional treatment plant.

    “Previous study regarding LCA of water treatment plants reported that treatment plant with nano fi ltration unit exerted less environmental impact than the conventional treatment plant (Bonton et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bonton et al., 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    The competitive coefficient is susceptible to the Mg2+/Li+ ratio, which should be less than 20.

    “The competitive coef fi cient was susceptible to the Mg 2 þ /Li þ ratio which should be less than 20 (Sun et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sun et al., 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    Compared with the traditional lithium extraction process, the nanofiltration membrane process was more environmentally friendly because it did not directly consume large amounts of fossil resources.

    “Compared with the traditional lithium extraction process, nanofi ltration membrane process was more environmentally friendly since it did not directly consume large amounts of fossil resources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    More than 60% of global lithium products are produced from brines.

    “more than 60% of the global lithium products are produced from brines (Tadesse et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tadesse et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    An LCA study on multicrystalline silicon photovoltaic cell production showed that increasing the use proportion of renewable energy sources and improving power generation consumption efficiency was crucial because energy consumption mainly contributed to high-score global warming potential.

    “LCA study on multicrystalline silicon photovoltaic cell production exhibited that it was crucial to increase the use proportion of renewable sources of energy and to improve the consumption ef fi ciency of power generation since energy consumption mainly contributed to the high-score global warming potential (Hong et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hong et al., 2016 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.1. Life cycle impact assessment analysis

    A membrane with covalent binding had much lower environmental impacts than activated carbon made from coal for a water membrane purification system.

    “Membrane with covalent binding also had much lower environmental impacts than activated carbon made from coal for water membrane puri fi cation system (Manda et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Manda et al., 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.2. Life cycle cost analysis

    LCC analysis can effectively reflect the economic rationality of a process to determine whether it is economically friendly.

    “LCC analysis can effectively re fl ect the economic rationality of the process to determine whether a process is economically friendly (Ye et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ye et al., 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Nanofiltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines.

    “Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines.”
    • Also stated in: § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. · boosted
      “In recent years, membrane process as a promising lithium extraction technique has been gradually used to extract lithium from salt lakes because this technique allows univalent ions to pass through the membrane to trap divalent/ polyvalent ions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 4.2. Life cycle cost analysis

    Improvement of resource utilization efficiency and dust-removing equipment will significantly reduce environmental governance costs and increase life cycle economic performance.

    “Therefore, improvement of resource utilization ef fi ciency and dust-removing equipment will signi fi cantly reduce the environmental governance costs and increase life cycle economic performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 3.2. Methodology, LCI, and data sources LCA focuses on evaluating the use of natural resources and environmental pollution. It is important to identify the key factor affecting the ecosystem and put forward the corresponding suggestions for improving rational exploitation of salt-lake resources. LCA on lithium extraction from salt lakes only considered the impact on the ecosystem and resource consumption because the exploitation and production of lithium resources in salt lakes possessed simple process, short transportation distance, and waste disposal without occupying lands. Therefore, eight kinds of environmental pollutants (CO2, CH4, SO2, NOX, N2O, CO, VOC, and PM10) and fi ve kinds of environmental impact assessment indicators including global warming potential (GWP), acidi fi cation potential (AP), photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP), soot and ashes (SA), and nutrient enrichment (NE) were selected for LCA on lithium nano fi ltration extraction. The emission of individual pollutant in each impact type was weighted by emission coef fi cient to obtain a uniform unit value for analyzing each category of environmental impact. The emission coef fi cients and water consumption coef fi cient of various energy sources referred to Chinese life cycle database (CLCD) (Liu et al., 2010). The analysis of life cycle cost (LCC) and life cycle water consumption (LCWC) in this study was performed on the basis of the system boundary of LCA and the calculation model referred to the previous study (Xiang, 2016). The environmental pollutants selected in this study included CO2, CH4, SO2, NOX, N2O, CO, VOC and PM10. The emission of pollutants was calculated by the following Eq. (1):

    Equipment loss and maintenance were not considered in the LCC because the functional unit was 1 kg Li2CO3 and the process was at small trial scale.

    “However, the function unit in this study was 1 kg Li2CO3 products, which was a small yield and belonged to small trial scale. Therefore, the loss and maintenance of equipment were not considered in this study.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The cost of the nanofiltration membrane device (about 29,100 USD) generally accounts for most of the process cost.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in salt lakes.

    “Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes.”
    • Also stated in: § a b s t r a c t Lithium is an important strategic resource and the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau possesses abundant liquid lithium resources in the salt lakes. Nano fi ltration is a promising technique for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines. However, no information on the environmental impact of lithium nano fi ltration extraction is available. This study used life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost (LCC) and water consumption (LCWC) methods to evaluate the environmental burden of lithium nano fi ltration extraction technique with the functional unit of 1 kg Li2CO3 products. The results showed that nano fi ltration stage was the key process to produce the environment burden based on higher values of global warming potential, acidi fi cation potential, photochemical ozone creation potential, soot & ashes, and nutrient enrichment in comparison with the other stages of lithium extraction. Electricity consumption was the major contributor to global warming potential. The total life cycle cost was 18.01 USD with internal cost accounting for 99.99%. Direct water consumption was 22 times higher than indirect water consumption in this process. The water and energy consumption of nano fi ltration stage accounted for 98.05% and 53.95% of total consumption, respectively. The total cost of energy and water consumption for nanofi ltration technique in different regions followed the order of Tibet > Inner Mongolia > Sinkiang > Qinghai. This study provided quantitative data and theoretical basis for lithium resource exploitation in the ecologically-fragile regions in the world. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. · plain
      “Lithium is an important strategic resource and mainly distributed in the QinghaiTibet Plateau of China with LiCl total reserves of 15.2 -10 6 t and 80% of lithium resource existing in the salt lakes of Qaidam Basin (Shi et al., 2018; Song et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Shi et al., 2018 source
    • cites Song et al., 2014 source
    • cites Yu et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Water-energy nexus analysis

    More than 60% of global lithium production is extracted from brines.

    “More than 60% global lithium production is extracted from brines (Tadesse et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tadesse et al., 2019 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Water-energy nexus analysis

    The consumption of non-domestic water in Sinkiang, Inner Mongolia, and Tibet is charged by a 2-step water price with the second step price higher than the first step price, while non-domestic water in Qinghai is charged by an identical price.

    “The consumption of non-domestic water in Sinkiang, Inner Mongolia, and Tibet is charged by 2-step water price with the second step price higher than the fi rst step price while nondomestic water in Qinghai is charged by the identical price.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NBS, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    The fresh water could be recycled to dilute the brines.

    “The fresh water could be recycled to dilute the brines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. Conclusions

    This study provides a theoretical basis for the lithium industry, especially in ecologically fragile regions in the world.

    “This study provides theoretical basis for the lithium industry especially in ecologically fragile regions in the world.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Information on LCA and sustainability of brine processing is still scarce.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    Water separated at hyperfiltration/electrodialysis stages could also be recycled for diluting the raw brines.

    “Water separated at hyper fi ltration/electrodialysis stages could also be recycled for diluting the raw brines.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    Indirect water consumption was reported to account for a larger proportion in total water consumption of olefins production, contrary to the results of this study.

    “Indirect water consumption was reported to account for a larger proportion in total water consumption of ole fi ns production (Xing et al., 2016), which was contrary to the results of this study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xing et al., 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5. Conclusions

    Improvement in resource utilization efficiency and water recycling were more effective to reduce environmental governance costs and environmental load, even though the nanofiltration extraction technique was relatively environmentally-friendly.

    “The results showed that improvement in resource utilization ef fi ciency and water recycling were more effective to reduce the environmental governance costs and environmental load even the nano fi ltration extraction technique was relatively environmentally-friendly.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Water-energy nexus analysis

    The electricity consumption of Sinkiang and Qinghai is charged by step price while that of Inner Mongolia and Tibet is charged by an identical price.

    “The electricity consumption of Sinkiang and Qinghai is charge by step price while that of Inner Mongolia and Tibet is charged by the identical price.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NBS, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 4.3. Water-energy consumption and water mass balance analysis

    Na2CO3 was the key factor affecting the internal cost and deserved careful selection during the extraction process.

    “As a result, Na2CO3 was the key factor affecting the internal cost to deserve careful selection during the extraction process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Water-energy nexus analysis

    The water resources of Sinkiang, Inner Mongolia, Qinghai, and Tibet were 58, 81, 89 and 362 km3-water/m2-land, respectively.

    “The water resources of Sinkiang, Inner Mongolia, Qinghai, and Tibet were 58, 81, 89 and 362 km 3 -water/m 2 -land, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites NBS, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 4.4. Water-energy nexus analysis

    Water-energy nexus is critical for many industries, and energy consumption had effects on water use policies to subsequently affect the related industry.

    “Water-energy nexus is critical for many industries and the previous study also reported that energy consumption had effects on water use policies to subsequently affect the related industry (Xiang and Jia, 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xiang and Jia, 2019 source
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Separation of magnesium and lithium is the critical step in lithium extraction.

    “Moreover, the separation of magnesium and lithium is the critical step in lithium extraction.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Membrane fouling is a frequent problem during nanofiltration extraction of lithium due to high-concentration salts in brine.

    “Membrane fouling is the frequent problem during nano fi ltration extraction of lithium due to high-concentration salts in brine.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Lithium extraction from salt lakes has a simple process, short transportation distance, and waste disposal that does not occupy land.

    “LCA on lithium extraction from salt lakes only considered the impact on the ecosystem and resource consumption because the exploitation and production of lithium resources in salt lakes possessed simple process, short transportation distance, and waste disposal without occupying lands.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The cost of the nanofiltration membrane device (about 29,100 USD) generally accounts for most of the process cost.

    “Cost of the nano fi ltration membrane device with the price of about 29,100 USD generally accounts for the most of process cost.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Raw brine must be diluted before nanofiltration membrane separation to prevent membrane fouling.

    “Raw brine must be diluted before nano fi ltration membrane separation to prevent the membrane fouling.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Information on LCA and sustainability of brine processing is still scarce.

    “However, information on LCA and sustainability of brine processing is still scarce.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Electrodialysis POCP exceeds the stage described as dominant

    Minor

    The reported electrodialysis POCP, 3.65 × 10−6, is greater than the nanofiltration value, 2.21 × 10−6. Nanofiltration therefore cannot also contribute 51.84% of total POCP.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kang, 2014, Preliminary test of separation of Mg2+/Li+ in salt lake brine by nanofiltration, Inorg. Chem. Ind., 46, 22
  2. Xiang, D., 2016. reportTechno-Economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-To-Olefins Processes. Ph.D. thesis. South China University of Technology. Guangzhou, China.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, B., Wu, J., & Lu, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Ludong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wu, Jun
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
261
Pages
121152
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012367065
Cited by
43
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge Repository of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, CAS (Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Knowledge Repository of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, CAS (Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
lithium recovery, nanofiltration, salt lake brine, water-energy nexus, environmental impact, global warming potential, acidification, water consumption, life cycle cost, Tibetan Plateau, ecologically fragile areas, lithium carbonate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review