The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery of organic carbon from municipal mixed waste compost for the production of fertilizers
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Nowadays, the extensive use of inorganic fertilizers has increased the salinity of soil and decreased optimal assimilation of nutrients by crops. Organic carbon is basic for controlling the nutrient level in soil and nutrient assimilation by plants. The objective of this study was to develop a process for recovering organic carbon using compost from mixed municipal waste as raw material. The use of fertilizers from organic residues could replace mineral fertilizers, contributing to resources preservation and recycling of organic matter. In this way, a Taguchi experimental design was proposed to select the most suitable operating conditions for recovering organic carbon from the organic residue. The variable factors were the solid:liquid ratio, type of solvent, extraction time, and particle size. The optimum extraction conditions were: solid:liquid ratio 1:2.5, 1 M potassium hydroxide (KOH), 72 h, and particle size > 1 mm. Subsequent experiments concluded that separating the mixed municipal waste compost (MMWC) by fractions of different particle sizes before extraction process is not recommended. Under these conditions, the total organic carbon concentration in the extract was 6.9% w/w, of which the content of humic acids was 47.6%. On the other hand, the extract complies with the legal requirements of Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 for fertilizing products regarding composition. Germination tests were carried out to analyze the phytotoxic effects of organic extracts. Finally, a preliminary economic study showed the viability for a production plant with a capacity of 300 kg/h of MMWC. The production of liquid fertilizer was 200 L per 100 kg of dry compost, and the estimated sale price to obtain economic benefits was 1 €/L of fertilizer for a plant whose total investment cost was 1,600 k€.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, Fernández- Delgado et al. (2020)proposed the extraction of organic carbon from municipal solid waste compost technology to produce 200 L of liquid fertilizer at €1/liter per 100 kg of dry compost.”
From Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Fernández-Delgado et al. 2020
Citations
Cites
Standard methods: For the examination of water and waste water
(1990) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0003-2697(90)90598-4 · Cited by 72,091
Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A review
Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282 · Cited by 2,345
Evaluating toxicity of immature compost
Zucconi, F., Pera, A., Forte, M., & Bertoldi, M. (1981) · Biocycle · Cited by 1,149
SMITH, S. (2009) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2008.06.009 · Cited by 891
The threat of soil salinity: A European scale review
Daliakopoulos, I. N., Tsanis, I. K., Koutroulis, A., Kourgialas, N. N., Varouchakis, A. E., Karatzas, G. P., & Ritsema, C. J. (2016) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.177 · Cited by 828
Sepehri, A., & Sarrafzadeh, M.-H. (2019) · Applied Water Science · doi:10.1007/s13201-019-1017-6 · Cited by 485
Seed germination test for toxicity evaluation of compost: Its roles, problems and prospects
Luo, Y., Liang, J., Zeng, G., Chen, M., Mo, D., Li, G., & Zhang, D. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.09.023 · Cited by 478
Effects of composting on phytotoxicity of spent pig-manure sawdust litter
Tiquia-Arashiro, S. M., Tam, N. F. Y., & Hodgkiss, I. J. (1996) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/s0269-7491(96)00052-8 · Cited by 460
Lin, L., Xu, F., Ge, X., & Li, Y. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.025 · Cited by 382
Ma, M.-M., & Mu, T.-H. (2016) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.095 · Cited by 378
Cited by
Peng, X., Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01551-5 · Cited by 333
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernández-Delgado, M., Amo-Mateos, E. D., Lucas, S., García-Cubero, M. T., & Coca, M.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Valladolid (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Coca, Mónica
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 265
- Pages
- 121805
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3021865895
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Hispana (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- UVaDOC UVaDOC University of Valladolid Documentary Repository (University of Valladolid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- EU-FEDER (0119_VALORCOMP_2_P, UIC 129, CLU 2017–09)
- Castilla y León
- Junta de Castilla y León (E-47-2019-0114592)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- organic carbon recovery, liquid fertilizer, potassium hydroxide extraction, humic acid, organic waste recycling, fertilizer production, phytotoxicity, extraction optimization, economic feasibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.