The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Don’t scrap the waste: The need for broader system boundaries in bioplastic food packaging life-cycle assessment – A critical review
Open accessAbstract
The increasing amount of plastic waste generated each year, fuelled by the growing consumption of single-use plastics in food packaging applications, threatens the integrity of our ecosystems while creating an unprecedented waste management crisis. The biodegradable properties of some bioplastics have been identified as a promising solution to divert food and food packaging waste from landfill while avoiding plastic leaking into the environment. However, such bio-based biodegradable alternatives may not necessarily provide an improvement in overall environmental impact, especially when considering their efficacy at preventing food waste. This is the first systematic review to investigate the relationship between food packaging and food waste, based on conventional and biodegradable plastic food packaging life-cycle assessments (LCAs). It focuses on the trade-offs that may occur between food packaging production, end-of-life management and food waste prevention across the entire food packaging life-cycle. Following a review of 111 papers, 19 were identified for further investigation and data extraction. Quantitative analysis for five LCA impact categories, as well as hotspot analysis and end-of-life scenario analysis for global warming potential were conducted. The resulting picture is conflicting and suggests that though bioplastics display environmental benefits for global warming potential and non-renewable energy use, these are often negated by the agricultural inputs required for bioplastics raw material production. While the LCAs included in this study do not provide enough evidence to state which polymer is best at reducing food waste, they emphasise the environmental footprint associated with food production and food waste, and highlight the importance of including the food itself in food packaging LCAs. Therefore, focusing on food packaging performance in food waste minimisation is critical. We found that bioplastics provide the benefit of diverting biodegradable waste from landfill or incineration to ‘greener’ streams such as anaerobic digestion and composting, contributing to a circular economy. Encouraging biodegradable bioplastics should target plastic packaging where effective recycling measures are failing due to the challenges that remain for treating and recycling materials made of multiple, highly food-contaminated layers. The bioplastic industry is still young and optimising both the manufacturing process and material biophysical properties would contribute towards improving the overall environmental profiles of bioplastics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems
Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., Garnett, T., Tilman, D., DeClerck, F., Wood, A., et al. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4 · Cited by 10,880
Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics
Song, J. H., Murphy, R. J., Narayan, R., & Davies, G. B. H. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0289 · Cited by 971
Narancic, T., Verstichel, S., Reddy Chaganti, S., Morales-Gamez, L., Kenny, S. T., De Wilde, B., Babu Padamati, R., & O’Connor, K. E. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b02963 · Cited by 632
Napper, I. E., & Thompson, R. C. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b06984 · Cited by 475
Williams, H., & Wikström, F. (2011) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.008 · Cited by 353
Mapping the Influence of Food Waste in Food Packaging Environmental Performance Assessments
Heller, M. C., Selke, S. E. M., & Keoleian, G. A. (2019) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12743 · Cited by 142
Cited by
Depolymerization within a Circular Plastics System
Clark, R. A., & Shaver, M. P. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00739 · Cited by 408
Fanzo, J., Haddad, L., Schneider, K. R., Béné, C., Covic, N. M., Guarin, A., Herforth, A. W., Herrero, M., Sumaila, U. R., Aburto, N. J., et al. (2021) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102163 · Cited by 341
Tripathi, N., Misra, M., & Mohanty, A. K. (2021) · ACS Engineering Au · doi:10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00011 · Cited by 304
Achieving a circular bioeconomy for plastics
Kakadellis, S., & Rosetto, G. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abj3476 · Cited by 183
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kakadellis, S., & Harris, Z. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 274
- Pages
- 122831
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3042968194
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Don’t scrap the waste: The need for broader system boundaries in bioplastic food packaging life-cycle assessment – A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122831
- The paper
- Kakadellis, S., & Harris, Z. M. (2020). Don’t scrap the waste: The need for broader system boundaries in bioplastic food packaging life-cycle assessment – A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122831
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.