CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Managing intellectual capital for sustainability: Evidence from a Re-municipalized, publicly owned waste management firm

Minoja, Mario, Romano, Giulia·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123213
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123213

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. Amayah, 2013, Determinants of knowledge sharing in a public sector organization, J. Knowl. Manag., 17, 454
  2. Antonioli, 2012, The municipal waste management sector in Europe: shifting boundaries between public service and the market, Ann. Public Coop. Econ., 83, 505, 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2012.00475.x · DOI
  3. Awan, 2014, The concept of civic sustainability is need of hour, Res. J. Environ. Earth Sci., 6, 347
  4. Awan, 2018, Buyer-supplier relationship on social sustainability: moderation analysis of cultural intelligence, Cogent Bus. Manag., 5, 1, 10.1080/23311975.2018.1429346 · DOI
  5. Awan, 2018, Understanding influential factors on implementing social sustainability practices in manufacturing firms: an interpretive structural modelling (ISM) analysis, Proc. Manuf., 17, 1039
  6. Barney, 2018, Why resource-based theory’s model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective, Strat. Manag. J., 39, 3305, 10.1002/smj.2949 · DOI
  7. Becker, 2015, Remunicipalization in German cities: contesting neo-liberalism and reimagining urban governance?, Space Polity, 19, 76, 10.1080/13562576.2014.991119 · DOI
  8. Bel, 2018, Privatisation, contracting-out and inter-municipal cooperation: new developments in local public service delivery, Local Govern. Stud., 44, 11, 10.1080/03003930.2017.1403904 · DOI
  9. Bel, 2008, Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 52, 1337, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.07.014 · DOI
  10. Bocken, 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, J. Ind. Prod. Eng., 33, 308
  11. Boiral, 2002, Tacit knowledge and environmental management, Long. Range Plan., 35, 291, 10.1016/S0024-6301(02)00047-X · DOI
  12. Bratt, 2013, Assessment of criteria development for public procurement from a strategic sustainability perspective, J. Clean. Prod., 52, 309, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.007 · DOI
  13. Broadbent, 2008, Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research, Account Audit. Account. J., 21, 129, 10.1108/09513570810854383 · DOI
  14. Burger, 2019, The heterogeneous skill-base of circular economy employment, Res. Pol., 48, 248, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.015 · DOI
  15. Chang, 2012, The determinants of green intellectual capital, Manag. Decis., 50, 74, 10.1108/00251741211194886 · DOI
  16. Chen, 2008, The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms, J. Bus. Ethics, 77, 271, 10.1007/s10551-006-9349-1 · DOI
  17. Cherubini, 2008, Life cycle assessment of urban waste management: energy performances and environmental impacts. The case of Rome, Italy, Waste Manag., 28, 2552, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.11.011 · DOI
  18. Cinca, 2003, The measurement of intangible assets in public sector using scaling techniques, J. Intellect. Cap., 4, 249, 10.1108/14691930310472857 · DOI
  19. Cinquini, 2012, Analyzing intellectual capital information in sustainability reports: some empirical evidence, J. Intellect. Cap., 13, 531, 10.1108/14691931211276124 · DOI
  20. Claver-Cortés, 2007, Intellectual and environmental capital, J. Intellect. Cap., 8, 171, 10.1108/14691930710715123 · DOI
  21. Clifton, 2019, Re-municipalization of public services: trend or hype?, J. Econ. Policy Reform
  22. Corvellec, 2011, The business model of solid waste management in Sweden—a case study of two municipally-owned companies, Waste Manag. Res., 30, 512, 10.1177/0734242X11427944 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Cots, 2011, Stakeholder social capital: a new approach to stakeholder theory, Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev., 20, 328, 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2011.01635.x · DOI
  24. Cuganesan, 2006, Reporting organisational performance in managing human resources: intellectual capital or stakeholder perspectives?, J. Human Res. Costing Account., 10, 164, 10.1108/14013380610718629 · DOI
  25. D’Alisa, 2010, Conflict in Campania: waste emergency or crisis of democracy, Ecol. Econ., 70, 239, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.021 · DOI
  26. Dameri, 2015, Smart city intellectual capital: an emerging view of territorial systems innovation management, J. Intellect. Cap., 16, 860, 10.1108/JIC-02-2015-0018 · DOI
  27. De Feo, 2010, Public opinion and awareness towards MSW and separate collection programmes: a sociological procedure for selecting areas and citizens with a low level of knowledge, Waste Manag., 30, 958, 10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.019 · DOI
  28. De Feo, 2019, Environmental and economic benefits of the recovery of materials in a municipal solid waste management system, Environ. Technol., 40, 903, 10.1080/09593330.2017.1411395 · DOI
  29. De Leaniz, 2013, Intellectual capital and relational capital: the role of sustainability in developing corporate reputation, Intang. Cap., 9, 262
  30. Dumay, 2013, Intellectual capital research: a critical examination of the third stage, J. Intellect. Cap., 14, 10, 10.1108/14691931311288995 · DOI
  31. Edge, 2005, Powerful public sector knowledge management: a school district example, J. Knowl. Manag., 9, 42
  32. Eisenhardt, 1989, Building theories from case study research, Acad. Manag. Rev., 14, 532, 10.2307/258557 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Eisenhardt, 2016, Grand challenges and inductive methods: rigor without rigor mortis, Acad. Manag. J., 59, 1113, 10.5465/amj.2016.4004 · DOI
  34. Elkington, 1994, Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development, Calif. Manag. Rev., 36, 90, 10.2307/41165746 · DOI
  35. Evans, 2017, Business model innovation for sustainability: towards a unified perspective for creation of sustainable business models, Bus. Strat. Environ., 26, 597, 10.1002/bse.1939 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Fassin, 2012, Stakeholder management, reciprocity and stakeholder responsibility, J. Bus. Ethics, 109, 83, 10.1007/s10551-012-1381-8 · DOI
  37. Fischer, 2020, The three dimensions of sustainability: a delicate balancing act for entrepreneurs made more complex by stakeholder expectations, J. Bus. Ethics, 163, 87, 10.1007/s10551-018-4012-1 · DOI
  38. Gau, 2011, A study of tacit knowledge management in the public sector, J. Knowl. Manag. Pract., 12, 1
  39. Ghinoi, 2020, The role of local stakeholders in disseminating knowledge for supporting the circular economy: a network analysis approach, Ecol. Econ., 169, 1, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106446 · DOI
  40. Goodland, 1995, The concept of environmental sustainability, Rev. Ecol. Syst., 26, 1, 10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000245 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Guerrini, 2017, Assessing efficiency drivers in municipal solid waste collection services through a non-parametric method, J. Clean. Prod., 147, 431, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.079 · DOI
  42. Guthrie, 2010, Advancing sustainable management of public and not for profit organizations, Publ. Manag. Rev., 12, 449, 10.1080/14719037.2010.496254 · DOI
  43. Guthrie, 2012, Reflections and projections: a decade of intellectual capital accounting research, Br. Account. Rev., 44, 68, 10.1016/j.bar.2012.03.004 · DOI
  44. Hage, 2018, The regional heterogeneity of household recycling: a spatial-econometric analysis of Swedish plastic packing waste, Lett. Spat. Resour. Sci., 10.1007/s12076-017-0200-3 · DOI
  45. Huang, 2011, Environmental consciousness and intellectual capital management: evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industry, Manag. Decis., 49, 1405, 10.1108/00251741111173916 · DOI
  46. Huang, 2009, Effective environmental management through environmental knowledge management, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 6, 35, 10.1007/BF03326058 · DOI
  47. Jamali, 2006, Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective, Bus. Process Manag. J., 12, 809, 10.1108/14637150610710945 · DOI
  48. Keenan, 2011, Corporate governance and intellectual capital: some conceptualisations, Corp. Govern. Int. Rev., 9, 259, 10.1111/1467-8683.00254 · DOI
  49. Keramitsoglou, 2013, Public participation in designing a recycling scheme towards maximum public acceptance, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 70, 55, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.015 · DOI
  50. Krausmann, 2009, Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century, Ecol. Econ., 68, 2696, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.007 · DOI
  51. Kunz, 2018, Stakeholder views on extended producer responsibility and the circular economy, Calif. Manag. Rev., 60, 45, 10.1177/0008125617752694 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Liu, 2009, A survey and analysis on public awareness and performance for promoting circular economy in China: a case study from Tianjin, J. Clean. Prod., 17, 265, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.003 · DOI
  53. Lombrano, 2009, Cost efficiency in the management of solid urban waste, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 53, 601, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.017 · DOI
  54. López-Gamero, 2011, Sustainable development and intangibles: building sustainable intellectual capital, Bus. Strat. Environ., 20, 18, 10.1002/bse.666 · DOI
  55. López-Ruiz, 2019, An intellectual capital approach to citizens’ quality of life in sustainable cities: a focus on Europe, Sustain. Times, 11, 1
  56. MacDonald, 2019, Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainability: designing decision making processes for partnership capacity, J. Bus. Ethics, 160, 409, 10.1007/s10551-018-3885-3 · DOI
  57. Marques, 2018, Tariff regulation in the waste sector: an unavoidable future, Waste Manag., 78, 292, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.028 · DOI
  58. Mårtensson, 2016, Corporate environmental strategies towards sustainable development, Bus. Strat. Environ., 25, 1, 10.1002/bse.1852 · DOI
  59. Massaro, 2015, Public sector knowledge management: a structured literature review, J. Knowl. Manag., 19, 530
  60. Massaro, 2018, Practitioners’ views on intellectual capital and sustainability: from a performance-based to a worth-based perspective, J. Intellect. Cap., 19, 367, 10.1108/JIC-02-2017-0033 · DOI
  61. Massarutto, 2007, Municipal waste management as a local utility: options for competition in an environmentally-regulated industry, Util. Pol., 15, 9, 10.1016/j.jup.2006.09.003 · DOI
  62. McAdam, 2000, A comparison of public and private sector perceptions and use of knowledge management, J. Eur. Ind. Train., 24, 317, 10.1108/03090590010346424 · DOI
  63. Pedrini, 2007, Human capital convergences in intellectual capital and sustainability reports, J. Intellect. Cap., 8, 346, 10.1108/14691930710742880 · DOI
  64. Petersen, 2018, Is contracting out of public services still the great panacea? A systematic review of studies on economic and quality effects from 2000 to 2014, Soc. Pol. Adm., 52, 130, 10.1111/spol.12297 · DOI
  65. Plata-Díaz, 2014, Alternative management structures for municipal waste collection services: the influence of economic and political factors, Waste Manag., 34, 1967, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.003 · DOI
  66. Ramìrez, 2010, Intellectual capital models in Spanish public sector, J. Intellect. Cap., 11, 248, 10.1108/14691931011039705 · DOI
  67. Romano, 2019, Paying returns to shareholders of water utilities: evidence from Italy, Sustainability, 11, 2033, 10.3390/su11072033 · DOI
  68. Romano, 2020, Factors affecting eco-efficiency of municipal waste services in Tuscan municipalities: an empirical investigation of different management models, Waste Manag., 105, 384, 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.028 · DOI
  69. Romano, 2019, Improving waste production and recycling through zero-waste strategy and privatization: an empirical investigation, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 146, 256, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.030 · DOI
  70. Rothenberg, 2003, Knowledge content and worker participation in environmental management at NUMMI, J. Manag. Stud., 40, 1783
  71. Sanchez, 2013, Knowledge management in environmental impact assessment agencies: a study in Québec, Canada, J. Environ. Assess. Pol. Manag., 15, 1
  72. Santis, 2019, Disclosure of intellectual capital components in integrated reporting: an empirical analysis, Sustain. Times, 11, 1
  73. Schaltegger, 2011, Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories and interactions, Bus. Strat. Environ., 20, 222, 10.1002/bse.682 · DOI
  74. Secundo, 2016, Managing intellectual capital through a collective intelligence approach: an integrated framework for universities, J. Intellect. Cap., 17, 298, 10.1108/JIC-05-2015-0046 · DOI
  75. Secundo, 2018, Intellectual capital management in the fourth stage of IC research. A critical case study in university settings, J. Intellect. Cap., 19, 157, 10.1108/JIC-11-2016-0113 · DOI
  76. Siggelkow, 2007, Persuasion with case studies, Acad. Manag. J., 50, 20, 10.5465/amj.2007.24160882 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Simões, 2012, On the economic performance of the waste sector: a literature review, J. Environ. Manag., 106, 40
  78. Song, 2015, Minimizing the increasing solid waste through zero waste strategy, J. Clean. Prod., 104, 199, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.027 · DOI
  79. Soukopová, 2018, Internal factors of intermunicipal cooperation: what matters most and why?, Local Govern. Stud., 44, 105, 10.1080/03003930.2017.1395739 · DOI
  80. Stahel, 2016, Circular economy, Nature, 531, 435, 10.1038/531435a · DOI · Paper page
  81. Starr, 2015, Patterns in trash: factors driving municipal recycling in Massachusetts, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 99, 7, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.03.009 · DOI
  82. Stubbs, 2008, Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model, Organ. Environ., 21, 103, 10.1177/1086026608318042 · DOI
  83. Tantalo, 2016, Value creation through stakeholder synergy, Strat. Manag. J., 37, 314, 10.1002/smj.2337 · DOI
  84. Triassi, 2015, Environmental pollution from illegal waste disposal and health effects: a review on the “Triangle of Death.”, Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health, 12, 1216, 10.3390/ijerph120201216 · DOI
  85. Valdovinos, 2012, The remunicipalization of Parisian water services: new challenges for local authorities and policy implications, Water Int., 37, 107, 10.1080/02508060.2012.662733 · DOI
  86. Wall, 2005, The measurement and management of intellectual capital in the public sector. Taking the lead or waiting for direction?, Publ. Manag. Rev., 7, 289, 10.1080/14719030500091723 · DOI
  87. Wasiluk, 2013, Beyond eco-efficiency: understanding CS through the IC practice lens, J. Intellect. Cap., 14, 102, 10.1108/14691931311289048 · DOI
  88. Wiig, 2002, Knowledge management in public administration, J. Knowl. Manag., 6, 224
  89. Yong, 2019, Nexus between green intellectual capital and green human resource management, J. Clean. Prod., 215, 364, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.306 · DOI
  90. Yusoff, 2019, Do all elements of green intellectual capital contribute toward business sustainability? Evidence from the Malaysian context using the partial least squares method, J. Clean. Prod., 234, 626, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.153 · DOI
  91. Zafra-Gómez, 2013, Reducing costs in times of crisis: delivery forms in small and medium sized local governments’ waste management services, Publ. Adm., 91, 51, 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02012.x · DOI
  92. Zollo, 2018, Toward an integrated theory of strategy, Strat. Manag. J., 39, 1753, 10.1002/smj.2712 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Minoja, M., & Romano, G.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
279
Pages
123213
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123213
Cited by
43
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Università di Pisa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review