The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 52 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Effective stakeholder governance in circular economy: Insights from Italian companies
Open accessAbstract
Notwithstanding a growing scholarly interest in stakeholder governance, the issue of how stakeholder governance can motivate a firm's stakeholders to cooperate to the transition to circular economy (CE) is still underdeveloped. This study intends to contribute to advance knowledge in this field by investigating the comparative effectiveness of three stakeholder governance forms – hub-and-spoke, lead role, and shared governance – to motivate stakeholders of a focal company (FC) to cooperate to the development and implementation of circular business models. Drawing on three case studies of Italian companies engaged in the transition to CE, we propose a contingent model of CE stakeholder governance. We found that the most effective stakeholder governance form at FC level depends on CE boundaries, the attitude of market forces to incentivise stakeholder cooperation to the CE, and the owners’ identity of the FC. We also found that a FC can adopt different stakeholder governance forms for the diverse CE-enhancing projects it has undertaken, appropriately tailoring the governance arrangements to the nature of activities of each project and to the value, uniqueness, and complementarities of the resources held by the stakeholders involved. This papers makes both theoretical and practical contributions. From a theoretical point of view, it advances knowledge at the intersection of stakeholder theory and governance of the CE in two main ways: first, by pointing out that the transition to the CE requires a shift from a perspective of a company responsibility to its stakeholders to that of stakeholders’ responsibility to a company, a supply chain or a local community they belong to. Second, by proposing some conditions under which shared forms of stakeholder governance are likely to foster this transition. From a pratical perspective, this paper suggests how stakeholder governance can be a tool to achieve CE targets at local community, industry , supply chain or individual firm level.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper uses three Italian circular economy pioneers to build a contingent model of stakeholder governance for circular business models. It finds that the most effective governance form depends on CE boundaries, owners’ identity, market incentives, and project-level novelty and resource characteristics.
Key findings
- At focal-company level, hub-and-spoke, lead role, and shared governance are comparatively most effective at micro, macro, and meso levels, respectively (Proposition 1).
- Ownership identity matters: hub-and-spoke, lead role, and shared governance are most effective for private, public, and non-profit private ownership, respectively (Proposition 2).
- When market incentives for CE are effective, hub-and-spoke is more effective than lead role or shared governance; when they are not effective, lead role and shared governance are more effective than hub-and-spoke (Proposition 3).
- At project level, shared governance effectiveness increases with novelty/uncertainty (Proposition 4) and with the value, uniqueness, and complementarity of resources controlled by the focal company and stakeholders (Proposition 5); a focal company can use different governance forms for different CE projects.
Methods
- Multiple-case qualitative study using the Gioia Methodology, selecting three Italian CE pioneers as “extreme exemplars”: Aquafil (hub-and-spoke), Contarina (lead role), and Comieco (shared governance).
- Data included archival sources (financial statements, sustainability reports, analyst presentations, websites) and 27 semi-structured interviews with owners and managers, totaling 1,590 minutes; five informants were interviewed again to discuss interpretations.
- Analysis proceeded through first-order informant codes, second-order themes, aggregate dimensions, and an illustrative grounded model with propositions, in a recursive/abductive process combining theory and data. Case numbers reported include Aquafil’s EUR 572 million revenues in 2023 and ECONYL at about 49% of revenues with a 60% target by 2025; Contarina’s 89.9% separate collection and 40 kg unsorted waste per capita in 2022 versus national averages of 64% and 181 kg; and Comieco’s paper recycling rate of 81.2% in 2022, above the EU’s 75% target for 2030.
Limitations
- Stated: the study is built on only three Italian cases, and the comparative analysis is limited to three stakeholder governance forms.
- Stated: future research should compare a wider set of institutional arrangements, governance rights, and organizational forms, and explore stakeholder governance for CE at meso and macro levels.
- Evident: the qualitative, case-based design uses selected CE pioneers and develops propositions rather than statistically tested findings, limiting generalizability beyond the Italian context and the chosen cases.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
3 of 52 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found that the most effective stakeholder governance form at FC level depends on CE boundaries, the attitude of market forces to incentivise stakeholder cooperation to the CE, and the owners ' identity of the FC.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also found that a FC can adopt different stakeholder governance forms for the diverse CE-enhancing projects it has undertaken, appropriately tailoring the governance arrangements to the nature of activities of each project and to the value, uniqueness, and complementarities of the resources held by the stakeholders involved.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Priula ensures that any disagreements or conflicts between munici palities, often due to different political orientations, are resolved outside Contarina and affect neither the harmony of its organisa tional context nor the efficiency of its operations.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No stakeholders other than share holders are represented on the company ' s board.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As shown in Fig. 2, the three FCs have different CG models driven by different types of ownership.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Comieco spreads its CE innovations (such as innovative paper and cardboard packaging, more recyclables, less heavy, cheaper raw materials) to all its owners/stakeholders, in order to contribute to the enhancement of the CE approach to the whole value chain and the market.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While regulated by one-to-one conventions, the acquisition of waste paper from municipalities occurs under uniform conditions throughout the country, based on a general contractual framework concluded between the National Association of Italian Municipalities (ANCI) and the national consortium, whose as sociates are all producers and users of packaging of any material (CONAI).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Importantly, when market conditions are favourable, municipalities may decide not to subscribe to or renew agreements with Comieco because they may find it more convenient to sell the paper and card board they have collected directly to paper mills or treatment plants.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aquafil collaborates with many different stakeholders to foster its business and its circular product ECONYL ® , developing direct individ ual contracts and agreements to collaborate.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aquafil -a case of a hub-and-spoke stakeholder governance -is increasingly able to procure and process secondary raw materials at lower costs than the virgin ones thanks to contract-based, one-to-one agreements with suppliers, improved logistics, technological upgrading and increasing experience with polymer processing plants.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 54
- It may state two separate claims as one. 44
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Schultz et al. (2024, p. 2174) found 'a gap in contemporary circular economy scholarship regarding the lack of knowledge on how precisely functional stakeholder governance for collaboration (K ¨ ohler et al., 2022) may pave the way for a transition to circular economy as a systemic change paradigm. '”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schultz et al., 2024 source
The Introduction (p. 2) explicitly identifies a gap in knowledge about how functional stakeholder governance for collaboration may enable a transition to a circular economy as a systemic change paradigm. The citing sentence closely follows that passage. (LLM, conf=0.95)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Köhler et al., 2022 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Regardless of the perspective adopted on circular economy (CE) (i.e. micro-level (individual companies), meso-level (value chains), or macro-level (a community in a geographic area) (Esposito et al., 2023; Aguinaga et al., 2018) -the transition toward CE is a complex and challenging endeavour.”
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites Esposito et al., 2023 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied passages and the indexed results are labeled as a paper about social enterprises, not the cited circular-economy paper. Searches for the circular-economy transition, its challenges, and micro-, meso-, and macro-level perspectives found no passage addressing the claim. The available copy therefore cannot verify it. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Aguinaga et al., 2018 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Furthermore, Schultz et al. (2024), in the context of the European chemicals and plastics industry, found that a systemic CE transition calls for managerial strategies that are collectively (industry or cross-industry) governance-oriented rather than company-centric.”
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schultz et al., 2024 source
The Conclusion (p. 15) identifies industry-oriented and cross-industry-oriented governance as approaches that require co-creation by multiple stakeholders. It says systemic circular-economy collaborations must operate in a collective governance mode, supporting the contrast with company-centric strategies. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the mayors of shareholder municipalities, elected by citizens, form an assembly that governs Priula, a consortium which owns 100% of Contarina.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, in one case (that of a waste utility serving neigh bouring municipalities), it received ownership rights and assumed governance roles in utility support.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of Contarina, the remunicipalisation of waste management service and the adoption of a lead governance model were decided when the profit maximisation goal would have led private M. Minoja and G. Romano owners to build an incinerator instead of developing waste selection plants and fostering recycling activities.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On customer side, fashion companies have launched collections using the Econyl fabrics produced by Aquafil, with premium prices.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Prompted by one of its most relevant customers (the US-based Interface) at a convention in 1998, Aquafil decided to embark on a long journey toward sustainability, which led it to develop a proprietary regeneration technology to produce sustainable fibres and polymers from nylon waste.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The higher the market prices for paper and cardboard, the lower the environmental contribution imposed on packaging producers.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of Aquafil, governance-related decisions are firmly in the hands of the CEO (a member of the controlling family) and the rest of the family, which holds the 68.6% of voting rights and appoints eight out of nine board members.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is the case of the digital platform bringing ECONYL ® to conscious consumers; this com mercial online platform is directly managed by Aquafil that invites different brands to contribute and share their products without requiring (and even fostering) direct partnerships among these fashion brands, that all concurrently contribute to increase consciousness for circular”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At times when the market price of recycled paper covers the cost of paper recycling collection, Comieco 'steps aside ' from its intermediary role, and municipalities are free to sell the wasted paper they have collected directly to paper mills or treatment plants.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 2022, it registered 89.9% of separate collection and production of unsorted urban waste per capita of only 40 kg per year, while the national average data were 64% and 181 kg, respectively.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition to multiple on-site visits, training initiatives, and information- and knowledge-sharing meetings, Contarina provides support for transferring its model to other municipalities, waste utilities, airports, universities, etc., under contractual cooperation agreements, which may entail the temporary relocation of Contarina ' s managers and employees (Romano et al., 2”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Romano et al., 2022 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Paper mills are obliged to buy from Comieco the waste paper it buys from municipalities, but the Comieco price from paper mills is not al ways able to cover the purchase and treatment costs it incurs.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Citizens are key stakeholders in the CE as users of waste management services, actors directly involved in household waste separation, and suppliers of waste that Contarina transforms into secondary raw mate rials.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CG of Contarina is strictly linked to its indirect municipality-ownership.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Comieco then sells paper to paper mills at controlled prices (linked to prices fixed monthly by the Chamber of Commerce of Milan) or through auctions to stimulate market competition.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Interestingly, these projects ' governance models may differ from the general stakeholder governance adopted by the FC.”
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“These boundaries correspond to the micro, meso, and macro levels (Meath et al., 2022), that is, the levels at which Aquafil, Comieco, and Contarina operate, respectively.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Meath et al., 2022 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The distributive rules of jointly created value (both costs and benefits) have all been (pre) defined by the associates: how the costs of the recovery, treatment, and recycling of packaging are allocated, and the norms regulating to whom, in which amounts, and at what prices the waste intermediated by Comieco is sold.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The board of directors is composed of 15 members belonging to the categories of paper mills (5 members), packaging producers (5 members), waste recuperators, and recyclers (5 members, 4 of which belong to a subset of waste treatment plants).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They usually have a limited duration and involve different numbers of M. Minoja and G. Romano existing and new stakeholders.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These projects aim to achieve incremental or radical innovations, or innovate, extend, or replicate the FC business model in related domains.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“It was founded in 1989 and it is owned by the 49 municipalities through the 'Consiglio di Bacino Priula ' (in short, Priula), a legal entity which owns 100% of the Contarina shares (Romano et al., 2021, 2022).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Romano et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Romano et al., 2022 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Founded in 1985 in Italy to promote the separate collection and re covery of paper and cardboard during a period of raw material shortage, Comieco is still a non-profit, private consortium.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Also thanks to the 'Comieco system, ' in 2020 Italy had already achieved the recycling target of 85% of waste paper packaging set by the EU for the year 2030.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ECONYL ® , whose functional and technical performance do not differ from those of the virgin nylon, is obtained from both end-of-life carpets or rugs and from other sources such as discarded or wasted nets for salmon phishing in Norway or Chile.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Priula, as the sole shareholder, appoints five board members of Contarina, who are selected based on their technical or administra tive expertise.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Contarina does not distribute any dividends and its governing and managing bodies are allowed to support other municipalities (through knowledge sharing, employee transfer) to 'import ' and replicate Con tarina ' s model (Romano et al., 2021).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Romano et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, Aquafil has been part (2017 -2022) of an EUfunded, research partnership named 'Effective, ' involving Genomatica (US-based) and 12 European companies to develop a new, bio-based raw material (bio-caprolactam).”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The assembly, which is the body responsible for making key gover nance decisions, such as the appointment of the board of directors and the approval of statutory changes and balance sheets, is formed by all 3.150 associates. The equity shares and voting rights of asso ciates are proportional to the volume of paper packaging treated or sold.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ECONYL ® , whose functional and technical performance do not differ from those of the virgin nylon, is obtained from both end-of-life carpets or rugs and from other sources such as discarded or wasted nets for salmon phishing in Norway or Chile.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our empirical evidence confirms this theoretical insight, but suggests that the nature of value creation activities may be different for different projects that contribute to a FC ' s transition toward the CE.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is the case, for instance, of the 'Effective ' project undertaken by Aquafil, whose results -the development and large scale production of a bio-caprolactam -are highly uncertain and expected no earlier than 2028.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A waste company located in a neighbouring territory that was inspired by the 'Contarina model, ' shares with Contarina a board member and the managing director.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Aquafil is involved in some partnerships with a Japanese company: the former brings its technological know-how related to Econyl, the latter its network of relationships with the whole production chain that it controls in Asia.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“At the firm level, the transition to a circular economy occurs through the development of circular business models, a challenging task (Atasu et al., 2021) which require new materials, improved product design, rethinking of logistics, new technologies, and the active involvement and cooperation of stakeholders that hold the necessary resources and capabilities.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Atasu et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“first, by pointing out that the transition to the CE requires a shift from a perspective of a company responsibility to its stakeholders to that of stakeholders ' responsibility to a company, a supply chain or a local community they belong to.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“As a type of environmental innovation, CE is characterised by 'long-term orientation and a high level of uncertainty compared with other innovations, ' as well as by a high degree of complexity due to the need of 'detailed knowledge and adaptation to the socio-cultural setting ' (Connelly et al., 2010; Garc ´ es-Ayerbe et al., 2019, p. 1323).”
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In global value chains (VCs), a shift from 'arm ' s length ' toward more complex governance structures is required to create and share new environmental knowledge and jointly develop innovation (De Marchi et al., 2013).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites De Marchi et al., 2013 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“As a notable exception, Schultz et al. (2021) explored governance mechanisms for both vertical and horizontal collaborations within the European polyurethane industry and how they can be integrated into supply chain management to foster CE.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schultz et al., 2021 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Convenience of transition toward CE is not to be taken for granted: in particular, it is not economically convenient when 'the cost of inputs is low, social costs are not internalised in products, or there is no need to minimise waste, close material cycles, or reuse products or their parts ' (Morseletto, 2023, p. 390).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Morseletto, 2023 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The transition to CE implies a sustainable business model innovation, which 'is about creating superior customer and firm value through addressing societal and environmental needs ' (Bocken et al., 2019, p. 1498).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bocken et al., 2019 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“The three models differ in terms of the distribution of decision-making and monitoring power, ways to achieve a fair distribution of joint value created, managers ' roles, and types of trust that sustain cooperation (Fig. 1 and Table 1).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bridoux and Stoelhorst, 2022a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The development of a new CBM requires experimentation capabilities at the institutional, strategic, and operational levels (Bocken and Konietzko, 2023), and dynamic capabilities for CE implementation (Khan et al., 2020), the development of circular manufacturing supply chains (Chari et al., 2022), and cross-sectoral collaboration in networks (K ¨ ohler et al., 2022).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bocken and Konietzko, 2023 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Khan et al., 2020 source
- Not checked yetcites Chari et al., 2022 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
In the paper
“Moreover, CE projects are complex because many residual resources are scarce, suffer from a lack of scale, and are privately owned.”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Patala et al., 2022 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In more concise terms, 'the transition to a CE must be M. Minoja and G. Romano supported by stakeholder collaborations ' (Schultz et al., 2024, p. 2174).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schultz et al., 2024 source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“However, they can lead to collective costs through ecosystem degradation (Patala et al., 2022).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Patala et al., 2022 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“- Shared governance is characterised by highly decentralised, bottomup, and collective stakeholder governance; all stakeholders are connected, participate, and have a relatively equal say in governance decisions. Stakeholders rely on peer monitoring and sanctioning, and a fair distribution of the value created jointly requires agreement on the applied distributive rule (s). A manager is 'one among”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bridoux and Stoelhorst, 2022a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“When stakeholders face collective action problems, that is, they are tempted to pursue their own interests at the expense of the common good, their motivation to cooperate may be enhanced by adopting different, more participative, and shared forms of governance.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bridoux and Stoelhorst, 2022a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“As a publicly-owned utility, Contarina ' s business model is based on 'a public service mission to organize a co-creation of value … between authorities who are legally responsible to manage waste and those in need of getting rid of waste while also protecting public health and the environment for future generations ' (Corvellec et al., 2012:”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Corvellec et al., 2012 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a report by Legambiente on the CE, the municipalities served by Contarina (a case of lead governance) emerged as those with the highest waste recycling rates and the lowest amounts of unsorted waste per capita.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The time, effort and energies that any type of shared governance re quires to listen to everyone ' s opinion and reach a common will are less compatible with efficiency seeking behaviours.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“This approach helps to reduce observer bias and increases the external validity of the research (Voss et al., 2002).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Voss et al., 2002 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the aim of adhering as closely as possible to the GM, we conducted a first-order analysis trying to adhere faithfully to informant terms, and then aggregated the second-order themes by combining extant theory and empirical evidence.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We also examined the financial statements of each of the three companies over the last three years to ascertain that they were economically and financially viable.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Stakeholders cooperate with the CE achievement without 'the expenditure of resources, time, effort, and opportunities forgone in decision-making ' when governance is shared (B & S, 2022a,b p. 222).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites B & S, 2022a,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“moreover, they also allow interviewees to express their points of view using their own terms.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This process was recursive to some extent, as we interviewed for the second time five informants (one from Aquafil, two from Contarina, and two from Comieco) to discuss our interpretation of the results and cross-case pattern recognition, as well as the emerging theory in the form of an illustrative grounded model.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Consistent with the Contarina case, Corvellec et al. (2012) acknowledged that the raison d ' ˆ etre of the two Swedish, publicly-owned waste management companies they M. Minoja and G. Romano studied 'is not to maximize their own profit. Rather, it is to offer their communities socially, economically, and environmentally sustainable waste management services and even to promote local”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Corvellec et al. (2012) source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several literature contributions explain that the owners of a firm affect its CG and strategic orientation (Shleifer, 1998; Connelly et al., 2010), and environmental strategy (Tan, 2002), and 'shape the underlying motivations of the firms accordingly which then might in fluence the implementation of sustainability ' (Ali Yawar and Kuula, 2021, p. 2).”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The lead role governance of Contarina, an operating company owned by a consortium formed by municipalities, is the solution designed to engage relatively unskilled stakeholders (the citizens) and delegate specialised managers to act on their behalf.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“When the circular economy is economically convenient with respect to the linear one, rivalry and profit-seeking may drive a FC ' s adoption of a CBM, and market contracting is sufficient to motivate stakeholders to cooperate without any need to assign them governance rights (Stoelhorst and Vishwanathan, 2024).”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stoelhorst and Vishwanathan, 2024 source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not checked yet
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The company ' s success in the CE depends on a business model built on: i) a strong commitment to separate waste collection through a doorto-door method, which enables the firm to reduce disposal costs and get additional revenues from waste recycling and reselling; ii) a 'pay as you throw ' system as a powerful incentive for citizens to minimise nonrecyclable waste and accurately separate”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Minoja and Romano, 2021 source
- Not matchedcites Romano et al., 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A consortium like Comieco is able to combine economies of scale and specialised know-how related to the CE with shared rules of cost allo cation (the CONAI environmental contribution) and value distribution (access to recycled raw material), which maximizes value creation for the supply chain as a whole and the perception of fairness by individual companies.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“B & S (2022a,b) argue that the comparative effectiveness of the three governance forms depends on the nature of value creation activities, namely the levels of complexity and dynamism that the three forms of governance 'can accommodate effectively ' (2022a, p. 228).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites B & S, 2022a,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites 2022a, p. 228
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Governance can be appropriately distributed in either Lead role and Shared governance form also in case of projects involving broad teams of stakeholders holding complementary, unique, potentially valuable re sources for transition to the CE, when the exploitation of this potential requires some joint development activities, and all stakeholders intend to share the results of their cooperation.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Recent studies have emphasized that an effective transition to the CE at micro, meso, and macro levels requires some forms of shared or col lective stakeholder governance, such as a polycentric (Patala et al., 2022), democratic (Moggi and Dameri, 2021), or participative (Aguinaga et al., 2018) form.”
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tailoring stakeholder governance to each project increases governance flexibility and makes it possible to enhance its overall effectiveness without affecting that of the FC as a whole.”
- Also stated in: § 7. Conclusions · p. 12 · plain
“In case of a company committed to CE through the design and implementation of multiple CE projects, stakeholder gover nance can be tailored to the specific features of each project to maximize their overall effectiveness in achieving CE targets without affecting the M. Minoja and G. Romano whole FC ' s governance.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 7. Conclusions · p. 12 · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Third, it generates some new concepts and ideas, as it proposes CE boundaries, owners ' identity, and market incentives effectiveness as new factors that are likely to affect the comparative effectiveness of the different stakeholder governance forms and, thus, may drive the deci sion of which of them to adopt to foster stakeholder cooperation at a FC level.”
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, it seems particularly valuable for the domain of the CE, because the transition to the CE is a promising path toward the common good of environmental sustainability, but tensions between individual (short-term) interests and collective (long-term) goals can emerge along this path and need to be solved.”
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Second, it extends the knowledge developed by B & S, 2022a,b in that it is applied to the specific domain of the CE and is expanded from the context of a focal firm to that of individual CE projects undertaken within it.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites B & S, 2022a,b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Stakeholder theory, in particular, seems to be 'firm-centric ' and prioritises how to manage possible trade-offs among stakeholders rather than to mobilise them to achieve collective goals (Johnson-Cramer et al., 2022).”
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Johnson-Cramer et al., 2022 source
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yet, there is still a lack of scholarly contributions on how stakeholder governance can foster stakeholder cooperation to support such a transition (Schultz et al., 2024) or, more generally, firms ' active involvement in dealing with the grand societal and environmental challenges.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schultz et al., 2024 source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the comparative analysis is limited to three forms of stakeholder governance.”
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 3Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Citations
Cites
Case study research: design and methods
Phelan, S. (2011) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2011.582317 · Cited by 21,904
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032 · Cited by 8,256
Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation
Gioia, D. A., & Chittipeddi, K. (1991) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250120604 · Cited by 4,162
Case research in operations management
Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., & Frohlich, M. (2002) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570210414329 · Cited by 2,963
Stockholders and Stakeholders: A New Perspective on Corporate Governance
Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165018 · Cited by 2,826
Research and scholarly methods: Semi‐structured interviews
Adeoye‐Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021) · JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY · doi:10.1002/jac5.1441 · Cited by 1,821
Conceptualizing the Circular Economy (Revisited): An Analysis of 221 Definitions
Kirchherr, J., Yang, N.-H. N., Spüntrup, F. S., Heerink, M. J., & Hartley, K. (2023) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001 · Cited by 1,697
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Adeoye-Olatunde, 2021, Research and scholarly methods: semistructured interviews, JACCP: J. Am. Coll. Clin. Pharm., 4, 1358
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Osei, A., Zhu, N., Borgi, H., & Cobbinah, J. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3390 · Cited by 57
Adam, I. K., Osei, A., & Aboagye, R. A. (2025) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2025.2483369 · Cited by 32
Boakye, P. B., Akparep, J. Y., & Salakpi, A. (2025) · Circular Economy and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43615-025-00519-1 · Cited by 18
Schultz, F. C., Valentinov, V., & Pies, I. (2025) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.70046 · Cited by 14
Sahu, D. K., & Choudhary, D. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.4345 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Minoja, M., & Romano, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Udine (IT)
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-10
- Volume
- 474
- Pages
- 143584
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402306847
- Semantic Scholar
- 4e5086a0341c417bbaa7d177e640123019d1d55d
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 16
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- European Union
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Keywords
- stakeholder governance, circular economy, circular business models, shared governance, stakeholder collaboration, market incentives, stakeholder identity, supply chain, Italian firms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review