The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Industrial collaborative agglomeration, marketization, and green innovation: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data
Abstract
Abstract The growth effect of collaborative agglomeration of manufacturing and producer service industries is receiving increasing attention from scholars. However, few studies have explored whether and how collaborative agglomeration of manufacturing and producer service industries affects green innovation. To bridge this gap, using the methods of the system generalized method of moments, the moderating effect, and the threshold effect, and employing the panel data of 30 provinces of China for 2003–2017, this paper studies the effect of industrial collaborative agglomeration on green innovation and how this influence fluctuates when marketization is included. The main findings are as follows: (1) During the sample period, industrial collaborative agglomeration generally had a blocking effect on China’s green innovation. A 1% increase in industrial collaborative agglomeration indicated a 0.461% decrease in green innovation efficiency. (2) Marketization can be an essential and efficient factor to correct the negative impact of industrial collaborative agglomeration through a moderating effect. (3) With the improvement of marketization, industrial collaborative agglomeration exhibits a U-shaped effect on green innovation, with the turning point occurring when the marketization index is 6.21. (4) As of 2017, 21 provinces have successfully exceeded the threshold of marketization, indicating that the current industrial collaborative agglomeration has been able to effectively improve China’s green innovation efficiency. However, the other nine provinces still trail behind them in marketization reforms, with industrial collaborative agglomeration continuing to negatively affect green innovation. (5) This paper concludes with recommendations to improve green innovation through industrial collaborative agglomeration and market reform.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00009-8 · Cited by 22,571
Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models
Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d · Cited by 19,880
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis
Tone, K. (2002) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00324-1 · Cited by 3,576
Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics
Rennings, K. (2000) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3 · Cited by 3,226
Critical success factors of green innovation: Technology, organization and environment readiness
Zhang, Y., Sun, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121701 · Cited by 508
Cited by
Liu, Y., Liu, S., Shao, X., & He, Y. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111779 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeng, W., Li, L., & Huang, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 279
- Pages
- 123598
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3048376189
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Industrial collaborative agglomeration, marketization, and green innovation: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123598
- The paper
- Zeng, W., Li, L., & Huang, Y. (2021). Industrial collaborative agglomeration, marketization, and green innovation: Evidence from China’s provincial panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.