Cited by 19,880Spatial and Panel Data AnalysisAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models

Arellano, Manuel, Bover, Olympia·1995·Journal of Econometrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-d

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The System GMM approach is particularly suitable for this study because it addresses key econometric challenges such as endogeneity, unobserved heterogeneity, and measurement errors.

    “the System GMM approach, as developed by Arellano and Bover (1995) and Blundell and Bond (1998), is particularly suitable for this study because it addresses key econometric challenges such as endogeneity, unobserved heterogeneity, and measurement errors.”
  • The paper uses a dynamic panel SYS-GMM estimator, which allows control for potential endogeneity problems.

    “Secondly, as estimation strategy, we use a dynamic panel systemgeneralised method of moments (SYS-GMM) estimator, which allows us to control for potential endogeneity problems.”

    From Finance-growth nexus in sub-Saharan Africa (2021) · cites this paper as Arellano & Bover 1995

  • The dynamic panel system GMM estimator was chosen to control country-specific effects, autocorrelation, and simultaneity bias.

    “This estimator, requiring a large number of cross-section units and a small number of time periods, was chosen in order to control: (1) country-specific effects, (2) autocorrelation problems, due to the presence of the lagged dependent variable in the model, and (3) simultaneity bias, caused by potential endogeneity of some of the explanatory variables.”

    From Finance-growth nexus in sub-Saharan Africa (2021) · cites this paper as Arellano & Bover 1995

  • PLS allows intuitive estimation and interpretation of the measures while preventing instability and proliferation challenges related to other models.

    “PLS allows intuitive estimation and interpretation of the measures while preventing instability and proliferation challenges related to other models (Arellano & Bover, 1995;Baltagi, 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arellano, M., & Bover, O.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Estudios Monetarios y Financieros (ES)
  • Bank of Spain (ES)
Corresponding author
Arellano, Manuel
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-07
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
29-51
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035554302
Cited by
19,880
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1339 · 2025: 1328 · 2024: 1354 · 2023: 1483 · 2022: 1372 · 2021: 1435 · 2020: 1240 · 2019: 1134 · 2018: 989 · 2017: 929 · 2016: 881 · 2015: 884 · 2014: 849 · 2013: 734 · 2012: 710
FWCI
44.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Econometrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
instrumental variable estimation, error components model, random effects models, panel data models, optimal estimators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review