The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial neural network model to predict the compressive strength of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete incorporating silica fume and natural zeolite
Abstract
Abstract The growing concern about global climate change and its adverse impacts on societies is putting severe pressure on the construction industry as one of the largest producers of greenhouse gases. Given the environmental issues associated with cement production, Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) has emerged as a sustainable construction material. This research experimentally studied the effect of partially substituting ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) with silica fume (SF) and natural zeolite (NZ) (by 0–30% with 5% increments) in the GPC activated by sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution with different concentrations (4, 6 and 8 M) and sodium silicate (water glass) solution on the compressive strength. Obtained results revealed that increasing the NaOH concentration reduced the concrete strength, while adding SF and NZ to the concrete yielded an improvement in the compressive strength. Moreover, this study proposed an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to predict the compressive strength of pozzolanic GPC based on GGBS (i.e., at the ages of 7, 28, and 90 days). The compressive strength of GGBS-based GPC (i.e., 117 concrete specimens manufactured out of 39 various mixtures) obtained by experimental tests was used to develop the model. The specimen age, NaOH concentration, contents of NZ, SF, and GGBS were considered as inputs variables for developing the ANN model. The predicted results establish the accuracy and high prediction ability of the proposed model. The findings of this study can bring significant benefits for the range of organizations involved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02478259 · Cited by 18,566
Kohonen, T. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58325 · Cited by 8,414
Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art
Duxson, P., Fernández-Jiménez, A., Provis, J. L., Lukey, G. C., Palomo, A., & van Deventer, J. S. J. (2007) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z · Cited by 4,742
Advances in alternative cementitious binders
Juenger, M. C. G., Winnefeld, F., Provis, J. L., & Ideker, J. H. (2011) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.11.012 · Cited by 1,851
Introduction to Machine Learning
Yu, F. R., & He, Y. (2019) · SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-10546-4_1 · Cited by 1,594
Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review
Khale, D., & Chaudhary, R. (2007) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0401-4 · Cited by 1,463
Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials
Davidovits, J. (1989) · Journal of Thermal Analysis · doi:10.1007/bf01904446 · Cited by 1,148
A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements
Li, C., Sun, H., & Li, L. (2010) · Cement and Concrete Research · doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.03.020 · Cited by 1,108
GHOSH-DASTIDAR, S., & ADELI, H. (2009) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065709002002 · Cited by 1,057
Assessment of CO2 reduction of alkali-activated concrete
Yang, K.-H., Song, J.-K., & Song, K.-I. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.001 · Cited by 832
Cited by
Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review
Thai, H.-T. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 748
Mohtasham Moein, M., Saradar, A., Rahmati, K., Ghasemzadeh Mousavinejad, S. H., Bristow, J., Aramali, V., & Karakouzian, M. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105444 · Cited by 391
Eco-friendly mix design of slag-ash-based geopolymer concrete using explainable deep learning
Ranasinghe, R. S. S., Kulasooriya, W. K. V. J. B., Perera, U. S., Ekanayake, I. U., Meddage, D. P. P., Mohotti, D., & Rathanayake, U. (2024) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102503 · Cited by 51
Cheruvu, R., Rao, B. K., & Reddy, M. A. K. (2025) · Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences · doi:10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2025.57.5.10 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahmansouri, A. A., Yazdani, M., Ghanbari, S., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H., Jafari, A., & Farrokh Ghatte, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 279
- Pages
- 123697
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3080952128
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 27.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial neural network model to predict the compressive strength of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete incorporating silica fume and natural zeolite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123697
- The paper
- Shahmansouri, A. A., Yazdani, M., Ghanbari, S., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H., Jafari, A., & Farrokh Ghatte, H. (2021). Artificial neural network model to predict the compressive strength of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete incorporating silica fume and natural zeolite. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123697
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.