Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial neural network model to predict the compressive strength of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete incorporating silica fume and natural zeolite

Shahmansouri, Amir Ali, Yazdani, Maziar, Ghanbari, Saeed, Akbarzadeh Bengar, Habib, Jafari, Abouzar, Farrokh Ghatte, Hamid·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Abstract The growing concern about global climate change and its adverse impacts on societies is putting severe pressure on the construction industry as one of the largest producers of greenhouse gases. Given the environmental issues associated with cement production, Geopolymer Concrete (GPC) has emerged as a sustainable construction material. This research experimentally studied the effect of partially substituting ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS) with silica fume (SF) and natural zeolite (NZ) (by 0–30% with 5% increments) in the GPC activated by sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution with different concentrations (4, 6 and 8 M) and sodium silicate (water glass) solution on the compressive strength. Obtained results revealed that increasing the NaOH concentration reduced the concrete strength, while adding SF and NZ to the concrete yielded an improvement in the compressive strength. Moreover, this study proposed an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to predict the compressive strength of pozzolanic GPC based on GGBS (i.e., at the ages of 7, 28, and 90 days). The compressive strength of GGBS-based GPC (i.e., 117 concrete specimens manufactured out of 39 various mixtures) obtained by experimental tests was used to develop the model. The specimen age, NaOH concentration, contents of NZ, SF, and GGBS were considered as inputs variables for developing the ANN model. The predicted results establish the accuracy and high prediction ability of the proposed model. The findings of this study can bring significant benefits for the range of organizations involved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123697

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Shahmansouri, A. A., Yazdani, M., Ghanbari, S., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H., Jafari, A., & Farrokh Ghatte, H.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
279
Pages
123697
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3080952128
Cited by
353
References
61
FWCI
27.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Artificial neural network model to predict the compressive strength of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete incorporating silica fume and natural zeolite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123697
The paper
Shahmansouri, A. A., Yazdani, M., Ghanbari, S., Akbarzadeh Bengar, H., Jafari, A., & Farrokh Ghatte, H. (2021). Artificial neural network model to predict the compressive strength of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete incorporating silica fume and natural zeolite. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123697

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.