The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral reasoning theory (BRT) perspectives on E-waste recycling and management
Open accessAbstract
Each year, millions of tons of electronic waste (or e-waste) are generated worldwide, thus, fueling concerns among scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and governments about e-waste recycling and management. The past few years have witnessed a growing interest among scholars to examine the behavioral issues concerning e-waste recycling. However, most of the existing studies have focused on adopting e-waste recycling and related innovations. It is already known that ‘reasons for’ and ‘reasons against’ the adoption of any innovation are quantitatively different. The current study bridges this gap by utilizing a novel consumer behavior framework called behavioral reasoning theory (BRT) to study e-waste recycling attitudes and intentions. The study examined the relative influence of ‘reasons for’ and ‘reasons against’ in predicting attitude and intentions within the context of e-waste recycling by using a single framework. The developed model was tested using structural equation modeling with 774 Japanese consumers. The study also examined the moderating role of environmental assessment and environmental concerns in influencing the studied associations. The results suggest that ‘reasons for’ was positively associated with attitude and intentions. The consumer values shared negative associations only with ‘reasons against.’ The study findings offer interesting insights for service providers, policymakers, and governments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287
Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective
Hair, J. F. (2010) · Cited by 12,255
Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content.
Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338 · Cited by 2,319
Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions
Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000002542 · Cited by 1,221
Exploring consumer attitude and behaviour towards green practices in the lodging industry in India
Manaktola, K., & Jauhari, V. (2007) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/09596110710757534 · Cited by 1,033
The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally Conscious Behaviors
Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1177/074391569101000206 · Cited by 979
Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025 · Cited by 794
Cited by
Digitalization to achieve sustainable development goals: Steps towards a Smart Green Planet
Mondejar, M. E., Avtar, R., Diaz, H. L. B., Dubey, R. K., Esteban, J., Gómez-Morales, A., Hallam, B., Mbungu, N. T., Okolo, C. C., Prasad, K. A., et al. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148539 · Cited by 916
Drivers and barriers of circular economy business models: where we are now, and where we are heading
Hina, M., Chauhan, C., Kaur, P., Kraus, S., & Dhir, A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130049 · Cited by 366
Self-citationCircular value chain blind spot – A scoping review of the 9R framework in consumption
Hunger, T., Arnold, M., & Ulber, M. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140853 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Dhir, A., Koshta, N., Goyal, R. K., Sakashita, M., & Almotairi, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 280
- Pages
- 124269
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3087077945
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 21.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioral reasoning theory (BRT) perspectives on E-waste recycling and management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124269
- The paper
- Dhir, A., Koshta, N., Goyal, R. K., Sakashita, M., & Almotairi, M. (2021). Behavioral reasoning theory (BRT) perspectives on E-waste recycling and management. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.