Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 794

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products

Park, Hyun Jung, Lin, Li Min·2020·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Many consumers have a positive attitude toward sustainable products; however they commonly end up not purchasing them. This study focused on exploring the gap between the purchase intention and purchase experience in recycled and upcycled fashion products. Factors including perceived values, risks, environmental concern, perceived consumer effectiveness, subjective norms, and demographic variables were examined to understand the discrepancy. This study provides insights into understanding consumers and developing effective strategies to encourage sustainable consumption.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Akturan, 2011, Segmenting young adults through their consumption styles: A cross-cultural study, Young Consumers, 12, 348, 10.1108/17473611111185896 · doi:10.1108/17473611111185896
  2. Belk, 2005, Consumer ethics across cultures, Consumption, Markets and Culture, 8, 275, 10.1080/10253860500160411 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Carrigan, 2001, The myth of the ethical consumer–do ethics matter in purchase behaviour?, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18, 560, 10.1108/07363760110410263 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Carrington, 2010, Why ethical consumers don't walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers, Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 139, 10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Carrington, 2014, Lost in translation: Exploring the ethical consumer intention-behavior gap, Journal of Business Research, 67, 2759, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.022 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Connell, 2010, Internal and external barriers to eco-conscious apparel acquisition, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34, 279, 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00865.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Connolly, 2003, Sustainable consumption: Consumption, consumers and the commodity discourse, Consumption, Markets and Culture, 6, 275, 10.1080/1025386032000168311 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dellaert, 2005, Marketing mass-customized products: Striking a balance between utility and complexity, Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 219, 10.1509/jmkr.42.2.219.62293 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dissanayake, 2015, An examination of the product development process for fashion remanufacturing, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 104, 94, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Do Valle, 2005, Combining behavioral theories to predict recycling involvement, Environment and Behavior, 37, 364, 10.1177/0013916504272563 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ellen, 1991, The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 102, 10.1177/074391569101000206 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Farrant, 2010, Environmental benefits from reusing clothes, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 726, 10.1007/s11367-010-0197-y · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gupta, 2009, To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26, 376, 10.1108/07363760910988201 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hamzaoui Essoussi, 2010, New or recycled products: How much are consumers willing to pay?, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 458, 10.1108/07363761011063358 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Hansen, 2010, Second hand clothing, Vol. 10, 232
  16. Jones, 1992, The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?, Rural Sociology, 57, 28, 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00455.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kim, 2005, Antecedents of green purchase behavior: An examination of collectivism, environmental concern, and PCE, ACR North American Advances
  18. Kim, 2014, How consumers differently perceive about green market environments: Across different consumer groups in green attitude-behaviour dimension, International Journal of Human Ecology, 15, 43, 10.6115/ijhe.2014.15.2.43 · DOI
  19. Kollmuss, 2002, Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?, Environmental Education Research, 8, 239, 10.1080/13504620220145401 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Lee, 2014, Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior, Journal of Business Research, 67, 2097, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.018 · DOI · Paper page
  21. McColl, 2013, It's vintage darling! An exploration of vintage fashion retailing, Journal of the Textile Institute, 104, 140, 10.1080/00405000.2012.702882 · DOI
  22. McNeill, 2015, Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: Fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39, 212, 10.1111/ijcs.12169 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Merle, 2008, Understanding the perceived value of mass customization: The distinction between product value and experiential value of co-design, Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 23, 27, 10.1177/076737010802300301 · DOI
  24. Minteer, 2004, Environmental ethics beyond principle? The case for a pragmatic contextualism, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 17, 131, 10.1023/B:JAGE.0000017392.71870.1f · DOI
  25. Morwitz, 2007, When do purchase intentions predict sales?, International Journal of Forecasting, 23, 347, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nicholls, 2006, Purchase decision-making in fair trade and the ethical purchase gap: Is there a fair trade twix?, Journal of Strategic Marketing, 14, 369, 10.1080/09652540600956384 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Noppers, 2014, The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives, Global Environmental Change, 25, 52, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Park, 2015, The influence of LOHAS consumption tendency and perceived consumer effectiveness on trust and purchase intention regarding upcycling fashion goods, International Journal of Human Ecology, 16, 37, 10.6115/ijhe.2015.16.1.37 · DOI
  29. Starr, 2009, The social economics of ethical consumption: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 916, 10.1016/j.socec.2009.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Sung, 2015, A review on upcycling: Current body of literature, knowledge gaps and a way forward. Part I
  31. Xiao, 2007, Validating a comprehensive model of environmental concern cross-nationally: A US-Canadian comparison, Social Science Quarterly, 88, 471, 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00467.x · DOI · Paper page
  32. Xu, 2014, Second-hand clothing consumption: A cross-cultural comparison between American and Chinese young consumers, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38, 670, 10.1111/ijcs.12139 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Yoo, 2016, The effects of e-mass customization on consumer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty toward luxury brands, Journal of Business Research, 69, 5775, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.174 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 794

Metadata

Authors
Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M.
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
117
Pages
623-628
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025
OpenAlex
W2889273673
Cited by
794
References
2
FWCI
40.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025
The paper
Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020). Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.