The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review
Open accessAbstract
Online purchasing, and hence e-commerce packaging production and use, have grown steadily in recent years, and so has their environmental impact as a result. This paper reviews the evolution of packaging over the last century through a compilation of scientific literature on e-commerce packaging focusing on its environmental side. The primary aims were to identify research gaps in e-commerce packaging and to propose new research lines aimed at reducing its environmental impact. A systematic search of abstracts was conducted to identify articles dealing with sustainability in e-commerce packaging in order to better understand changes in materials and formats, identify problems such as oversizing and allow prospective readers to become acquainted with the latest innovations in materials, sustainability and logistics. Based on existing research, packaging materials and technology evolved rapidly until the 1990s. Later, however, it has become increasingly difficult to further reduce their cost and environmental impact. Also, some packaging products continue to be made from non-renewable materials and thus restrict growth of e-commerce. Further research is needed with a view to producing new packages from renewable sources such as cellulose-containing materials, which are widely available in nature, or from recycled cellulose-based materials such as cartonboard. Improving distribution processes with new, more effective tools could additionally help alleviate the environmental impact of packaging. Similarly, new production processes such as additive manufacturing and 3D printing might help optimize package volume and shape, thereby facilitating more sustainable production through, for example, reduced CO2 emissions. Currently available technology can be useful to rethink the whole e-commerce packaging paradigm, which has changed very little over the past few decades.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy
Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016) · Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering · doi:10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · Cited by 4,002
Writing narrative style literature reviews
Ferrari, R. (2015) · Medical Writing · doi:10.1179/2047480615z.000000000329 · Cited by 1,907
Production of cellulose nanofibrils: A review of recent advances
Nechyporchuk, O., Belgacem, M. N., & Bras, J. (2016) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016 · Cited by 1,687
Reconstructing the Giant: On the Importance of Rigour in Documenting the Literature Search Process
Brocke, J. V., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009) · Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) · Cited by 1,383
Production of nanocrystalline cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass: Technology and applications
Brinchi, L., Cotana, F., Fortunati, E., & Kenny, J. M. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.033 · Cited by 1,121
Nanocellulose, a tiny fiber with huge applications
Abitbol, T., Rivkin, A., Cao, Y., Nevo, Y., Abraham, E., Ben-Shalom, T., Lapidot, S., & Shoseyov, O. (2016) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.01.002 · Cited by 1,006
Klemm, D., Cranston, E. D., Fischer, D., Gama, M., Kedzior, S. A., Kralisch, D., Kramer, F., Kondo, T., Lindström, T., Nietzsche, S., et al. (2018) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.001 · Cited by 936
Design for the real world : human ecology and social change
PAPANEK, V. J. (1985) · Cited by 933
Cited by
Smart city for sustainable urban freight logistics
Pan, S., Zhou, W., Piramuthu, S., Giannikas, V., & Chen, C. (2021) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1893970 · Cited by 139
Circular Economy: A Review of Review Articles
Hossain, M., Park, S., Suchek, N., & Pansera, M. (2024) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3867 · Cited by 77
Sadiq, M. W., Akhtar, M. W., Huo, C., & Zulfiqar, S. (2024) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2023.2278463 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Escursell, S., Llorach-Massana, P., & Roncero, M. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 280
- Pages
- 124314
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3088204197
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 45.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124314
- The paper
- Escursell, S., Llorach-Massana, P., & Roncero, M. B. (2021). Sustainability in e-commerce packaging: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124314
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.