Cited by 310Asphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationMaterials Engineering and ProcessingInnovative concrete reinforcement materials

Repurposing waste plastics into cleaner asphalt pavement materials: A critical literature review

Wu, Shenghua, Montalvo, Luke·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124355

Cites

183 of 183 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 184 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, S., & Montalvo, L.
Affiliations
University of South Alabama (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Shenghua
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
280
Pages
124355
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091090750
Cited by
310
References
184
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 3
FWCI
22.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of South Alabama
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Materials Engineering and Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Keywords
waste plastic recycling, asphalt pavement, plastic-modified asphalt, polyethylene terephthalate, high-density polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polypropylene, polystyrene, asphalt mixtures, rutting resistance, fatigue cracking, moisture resistance, aggregate replacement, binder modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review