Re-thinking producer responsibility for a sustainable circular economy from extended producer responsibility to pre-market producer responsibility
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Extended producer responsibility measures require manufacturers to be responsible for the entire lifecycle of a product, thereby costing the company to dispose or reuse spent products.
“Governments have responsibilities to reduce incentives for planned obsolescence through implementing extended producer responsibility measures that require manufactures to be responsible for the entire lifecycle of a product-therefore costing the company to dispose or reuse spent products (Maitre-Ekern, 2021).”
From Designed to break: planned obsolescence as corporate environmental crime (2022) · cites this paper as Maitre-Ekern, 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 190
- Authors
- Maitre-Ekern, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 286
- Pages
- 125454
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3112709072
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Law › European and International Contract Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
- Keywords
- circular economy, extended producer responsibility, waste management regulation, Waste Framework Directive, product repair, reuse, waste prevention, product life cycle, market access regulation, sustainable consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
