Cited by 222Environmental Education and SustainabilityEnvironmental Sustainability in BusinessGenerational Differences and Trends

Is the younger generation a driving force toward achieving the sustainable development goals? Survey experiments

Yamane, Tomomi, Kaneko, Shinji·2021·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125932

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yamane, T., & Kaneko, S.
Affiliations
Hiroshima University (JP)
Corresponding author
Yamane, Tomomi
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
292
Pages
125932
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120235084
Cited by
199
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 4
FWCI
31.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (18K12798)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Generational Differences and Trends
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals, younger generation, millennials, Generation Z, generational differences, sustainable living, job preferences, university students, job search behavior, public awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review