The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Blockchain technology is a revolutionary new protocol for sharing and updating information by linking ledgers or databases in a decentralised, peer-to-peer, open-access network. Blockchain is designed to ensure the data is stored and updated in a secure, tamper-proof and irreversible way. Despite being in its nascent stages, the blockchain research is developing rapidly in different fields, making it imperative to capture the ethical and sustainability implications of blockchain development and implementation. The circular economy also focuses on enhancing sustainability and social responsibility, alongside economic growth. In this article, we critically review blockchain technology’s current and potential contribution to the circular economy through the lens of sustainability and social responsibility. This paper contributes to the Industry 4.0 literature by identifying, collating and organising the disparate research on blockchain, with a critical focus on its positive impact and potential repercussions for the ethics agenda. Within this narrative review, we argue and highlight the extant and potential alignment of blockchain with circular economy. Our findings show that blockchain technology can contribute to the circular economy by helping to reduce transaction costs, enhance performance and communication along the supply chain, ensure human rights protection, enhance healthcare patient confidentiality and welfare, and reduce carbon footprint. We also evaluate the challenges to blockchain implementation for circular economy, in terms of trust, illegal activities, potential for hacking and the need to address these through suitable legislation and policy development. Furthermore, we acknowledge the potential upfront costs involved in implementing blockchain technology, although we observe that the benefits are likely to exceed the challenges. We conclude this article with recommendations for future research in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · Cited by 6,536
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.-G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4 · Cited by 4,276
Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 · Cited by 4,118
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples
Torraco, R. J. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305278283 · Cited by 3,534 · cited 3×
“An integrative literature review is considered suitable where the subject matter is new and needs further exploration (Torraco, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodThree pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5 · Cited by 3,279
Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues
Lu, Y. (2017) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005 · Cited by 3,012
A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing
MacInnis, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136 · Cited by 1,547
Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., & Jiang, W. (2016) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0574-6 · Cited by 1,240
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 · Cited by 1,116
The Emergent Role of Digital Technologies in the Circular Economy: A Review
Pagoropoulos, A., Pigosso, D. C. A., & McAloone, T. C. (2017) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.02.047 · Cited by 540
Cited by
Kurniawan, T. A., Dzarfan Othman, M. H., Hwang, G. H., & Gikas, P. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131911 · Cited by 282
Kurniawan, T. A., Othman, M. H. D., Liang, X., Goh, H. H., Gikas, P., Kusworo, T. D., Anouzla, A., & Chew, K. W. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117765 · Cited by 168
Ferreira, J. J., Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., & Rammal, H. G. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136841 · Cited by 167
Alshdaifat, S. M., Aziz, N. H. A., Alhasnawi, M. Y., Alharasis, E. E., Al Qadi, F., & Al Amosh, H. (2024) · Journal of Risk and Financial Management · doi:10.3390/jrfm17110509 · Cited by 68
From Public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; A Critical Literature Review
Mavidis, A., & Folinas, D. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811252 · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Upadhyay, A., Mukhuty, S., Kumar, V., & Kazancoglu, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 293
- Pages
- 126130
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3124280593
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 101.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126130
- The paper
- Upadhyay, A., Mukhuty, S., Kumar, V., & Kazancoglu, Y. (2021). Blockchain technology and the circular economy: Implications for sustainability and social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126130
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
