Cited by 1,240Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityElectronic Health Records SystemsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Healthcare Data Gateways: Found Healthcare Intelligence on Blockchain with Novel Privacy Risk Control

Yue, Xiao, Wang, Huiju, Jin, Dawei, Li, Mingqiang, Jiang, Wei·2016·Journal of Medical Systems

Abstract

Healthcare data are a valuable source of healthcare intelligence. Sharing of healthcare data is one essential step to make healthcare system smarter and improve the quality of healthcare service. Healthcare data, one personal asset of patient, should be owned and controlled by patient, instead of being scattered in different healthcare systems, which prevents data sharing and puts patient privacy at risks. Blockchain is demonstrated in the financial field that trusted, auditable computing is possible using a decentralized network of peers accompanied by a public ledger. In this paper, we proposed an App (called Healthcare Data Gateway (HGD)) architecture based on blockchain to enable patient to own, control and share their own data easily and securely without violating privacy, which provides a new potential way to improve the intelligence of healthcare systems while keeping patient data private. Our proposed purpose-centric access model ensures patient own and control their healthcare data; simple unified Indicator-Centric Schema (ICS) makes it possible to organize all kinds of personal healthcare data practically and easily. We also point out that MPC (Secure Multi-Party Computing) is one promising solution to enable untrusted third-party to conduct computation over patient data without violating privacy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10916-016-0574-6

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been no study to evaluate the use of blockchain technology in an mHealth system.

    “However, there has been no study to evaluate the use of blockchain technology in an mHealth system.”

    From Tamper-Resistant Mobile Health Using Blockchain Technology. (2017) · cites this paper as [12]

  • Blockchain may assist in creating a viable information ecosystem for managing personal health records by incorporating heterogeneous forms of data, including medical big data.

    “Further, blockchain may assist in creating a viable information ecosystem for managing such PHRs (Mamoshina et al., 2018) by incorporating heterogeneous forms of data (Yue et al., 2016;Shen et al., 2019;Silva et al., 2019), including medical big data (Kaur et al., 2018).”
  • Few reviewed studies acknowledged the need for regulatory compliance or standards and goals for compliance requirements.

    “Our review suggests that few studies have acknowledged the need for regulatory compliance (Yue et al., 2016) or even the standards and goals for compliance requirements (Zhang & Lin, 2018;Al Omar et al., 2019;Li et al., 2019).”
  • These concerns relate to technical limitations including node security, cryptographic security level, and data privacy during computations.

    “These concerns are mainly related to the technical limitations of blockchain technology, such as the security of individual nodes (Griggs et al., 2018), the level of security enabled by the cryptographic elements incorporated in framework (Tian et al., 2019), and the maintenance of data privacy while requesters complete their computations (Yue et al., 2016).”
  • If the accessibility of knowledge or data becomes seamless through expanded software, applications, and mobile devices, patients gain access to their medical history and details regarding care.

    “If the accessibility of knowledge or data becomes seamless through expanded Software and Applications and mobile devices, patients gain access to their medical history and details regarding care (Yue et al. 2016).”

    From Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence Technology in E-Health (2021) · cites this paper as Yue et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yue, X., Wang, H., Jin, D., Li, M., & Jiang, W.
Affiliations
Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Huiju
Venue
Journal of Medical Systems
Published
2016-08-26
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
218-218
ISSN
  • 0148-5598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-689X
OpenAlex
W2514994441
Cited by
1,240
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 95 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 177 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 168 · 2019: 188 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 7
FWCI
239.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
health data sharing, blockchain, patient data ownership, data privacy, secure multi-party computation, decentralized data management
MeSH terms
Confidentiality, Humans, Risk Management, Computer Security, Information Dissemination, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review