Cited by 58Public Procurement and PolicyPublic Policy and Administration ResearchSustainable Supply Chain Management

Community social capital, political values, or organizational capacity? Indicators of engagement in sustainable public procurement at the local level

Rodriguez-Plesa, Evelyn, Dimand, Ana-Maria, Alkadry, Mohamad G.·2022·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130556

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 58

Authors
Rodriguez-Plesa, E., Dimand, A.-M., & Alkadry, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Boise State University (US)
  • University of Connecticut (US)
Corresponding author
Alkadry, Mohamad G.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
338
Pages
130556
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206915273
Cited by
58
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
sustainable public procurement, local government, community social capital, political values, organizational capacity, political ideology, green purchasing, local government sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review