Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis

Fitzpatrick, Nick, Parrique, Timothée, Cosme, Inês·2022·Journal of Cleaner Production

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Belcher, 2019, Hidden Carbon Costs of the “Everywhere war”: logistics, geopolitical ecology, and the carbon boot‐print of the US military, Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 45, 65, 10.1111/tran.12319 · DOI
  2. Bohnenberger, 2020, Money, vouchers, public infrastructures? A framework for sustainable welfare benefits, Sustainability, 12, 596, 10.3390/su12020596 · DOI
  3. Brand, 2021, From planetary to societal boundaries: an argument for collectively defined self-limitation, Sustain. Sci. Pract. Pol., 17, 264
  4. Cosme, 2017, Assessing the degrowth discourse: a review and analysis of academic degrowth policy proposals, J. Clean. Prod., 149, 321, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.016 · DOI
  5. Demaria, 2013, What is degrowth? From an activist slogan to a social movement, Environ. Val., 22, 191, 10.3197/096327113X13581561725194 · DOI
  6. Dengler, 2022, Commoning care: feminist degrowth visions for a socio-ecological transformation, Fem. Econ., 1, 10.1080/13545701.2021.1942511 · DOI
  7. Đula, 2021, Degrowth dynamics: modelling policy proposals with system dynamics, J. Simulat., 15, 93, 10.1080/17477778.2019.1646108 · DOI
  8. Fanning, 2021, The social shortfall and ecological overshoot of nations, Nat. Sustain., 1
  9. Feola, 2019, Degrowth and the unmaking of capitalism, ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 18, 977
  10. Fletcher, 2019, Tourism and degrowth: an emerging agenda for research and praxis, J. Sustain. Tourism, 27, 1745, 10.1080/09669582.2019.1679822 · DOI
  11. Fouksman, 2019, Radical transformation or technological intervention? Two paths for universal basic income, World Dev., 122, 492, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.013 · DOI
  12. Haberl, 2020, A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a · DOI · Paper page
  13. Haddaway, 2018, The role of reporting standards in producing robust literature reviews, Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 444, 10.1038/s41558-018-0180-3 · DOI
  14. Haddaway, 2020, Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1
  15. Hanaček, 2020, Ecological economics and degrowth: proposing a future research agenda from the margins, Ecol. Econ., 169, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106495 · DOI
  16. Kallis, 2011, In defence of degrowth, Ecol. Econ., 70, 873, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007 · DOI
  17. Kallis, 2019, Socialism without growth, Appl. Econ. Lett., 30, 189
  18. Kerschner, 2018, Degrowth and Technology: towards feasible, viable, appropriate and convivial imaginaries, J. Clean. Prod., 197, 1619, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.147 · DOI
  19. Keyßer, 2021, 1.5 °C degrowth scenarios suggest the need for new mitigation pathways, Nat. Commun., 12, 2676, 10.1038/s41467-021-22884-9 · DOI
  20. Kirby, 2013, Transforming capitalism: the triple crisis, Ir. J. Sociol., 21, 62, 10.7227/IJS.21.2.5 · DOI
  21. Muraca, 2012, Towards a fair degrowth-society: justice and the right to a ‘good life’ beyond growth, Futures, 44, 535, 10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.014 · DOI
  22. Schmelzer, 2016, 10.1017/CBO9781316452035 · DOI
  23. Schneider, 2010, Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue, J. Clean. Prod., 18, 511, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.014 · DOI
  24. Spash, 2020, A tale of three paradigms: realising the revolutionary potential of ecological economics, Ecol. Econ., 169, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106518 · DOI
  25. Spash, 2021, Apologists for growth: passive revolutionaries in a passive revolution, Globalizations, 18, 1123, 10.1080/14747731.2020.1824864 · DOI
  26. Thiri, 2022, How social movements contribute to staying within the global carbon budget: evidence from a qualitative meta-analysis of case studies, Ecol. Econ., 195, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107356 · DOI
  27. Vetter, 2018, The matrix of convivial technology–assessing technologies for degrowth, J. Clean. Prod., 197, 1778, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.195 · DOI
  28. Videira, 2014, Improving understanding on degrowth pathways: an exploratory study using collaborative causal models, Futures, 55, 58, 10.1016/j.futures.2013.11.001 · DOI
  29. Wiedenhofer, 2020, A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: bibliometric and conceptual mapping, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab8429 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Fitzpatrick, N., Parrique, T., & Cosme, I.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
365
Pages
132764
ISSN
0959-6526
Cited by
212
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review