Augmented spatial LCA for comparing reusable and recyclable food packaging containers networks
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reusable PP crates are environmentally friendly after 20 rotations.
“The results showed that reusable PP crates are environmentally friendly after 20 rotations.”
From Environmental life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable food takeaway containers (2025) · cites this paper as [9]
The indexed Abstract gives a different threshold: considering GWP20, reusable PP crates are environmentally friendly after only 15 rotations, not 20. Although they would also meet that criterion at 20 rotations, the cited result does not place the threshold there. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sustainability of reusable packaging–Current situation and trends
Coelho, P. M., Corona, B., ten Klooster, R., & Worrell, E. (2020) · Resources, Conservation & Recycling: X · doi:10.1016/j.rcrx.2020.100037 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Potentials for the prevention of municipal solid waste
Salhofer, S., Obersteiner, G., Schneider, F., & Lebersorger, S. (2008) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.026 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Gardas, B. B., Raut, R. D., & Narkhede, B. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.113 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Levi, M., Cortesi, S., Vezzoli, C., & Salvia, G. (2011) · Packaging Technology and Science · doi:10.1002/pts.946 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Life cycle assessment of reusable plastic food packaging
Yadav, P., Silvenius, F., Katajajuuri, J.-M., & Leinonen, I. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141529 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Environmental life cycle assessment of single-use and reusable food takeaway containers
Kadabinakatti, S., & Shinde, A. (2025) · Acta Periodica Technologica · doi:10.2298/apt250512018k
- Authors
- Accorsi, R., Battarra, I., Guidani, B., Manzini, R., Ronzoni, M., & Volpe, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Accorsi, Riccardo
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 375
- Pages
- 134027
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4295837621
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- single-use packaging, logistics networks, transport emissions, corrugated boxes, food supply chain, geographic information systems, environmental impact of packaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
