Cited by 63Environmental Impact and SustainabilityMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementSustainable Supply Chain Management

Life cycle assessment of reusable plastic food packaging

Open access
Yadav, Pooja, Silvenius, Frans, Katajajuuri, Juha-Matti, Leinonen, Ilkka·2024·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

The present study focuses on the cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) of a reusable takeaway food container. The system boundary includes the production, transport, use, and end of life (EoL) stages of container, considering recycling and incineration, including all the inputs (material and energy) and outputs (emissions). Scenarios (10, 30, and 100 uses of a reusable container with EoL) were proposed and compared with a single-use container. The primary data was collected from industry and secondary data was taken from the literature and the Ecoienven 3.8 database. The functional unit (FU) was “one use of a container”, and the ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method was used. The results showed that with a centralised collection and washing system, the global warming potential (GWP) for a single-use container (0.020 kg CO2 eq./FU) per FU had higher GWP than 10 uses (0.015 kg CO2 eq./FU) and 100 uses (0.007 kg CO2 eq./FU) of the reusable container (EoL recycling). The GWP of a single-use container is 1.3 times higher than 10 uses of the container which results in a minimum six uses of the reusable container, providing a benefit over single-use container. In EoL incineration, 10 uses scenario led to a decrease in the GWP of 46%, while 100 uses resulted in a significant reduction in the GWP of 83% compared to single-use per FU. It was found that the efficiency of the return system for empty containers significantly influenced the results. This study also quantified plastic waste for various scenarios.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141529

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The GWP of a single-use container is 1.3 times higher than 10 uses of the container.

    “The results showed that the GWP of a single-use container is 1.3 times higher than 10 uses of the container, and the reusable containers should be used at least six times to surpass the impact of the single-use container.”
  • Reusable containers should be used at least six times to surpass the impact of the single-use container.

    “The results showed that the GWP of a single-use container is 1.3 times higher than 10 uses of the container, and the reusable containers should be used at least six times to surpass the impact of the single-use container.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. ISO (International Organization for Standardization), 2006. Environmental management: life cycle assessment; Principles and Framework. ISO. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-6526(2400977-6/sref42)
  2. Schulze, G., 2016. Growth within: A Circular Economy Vision for a Competitive Europe. Ellen MacArthur Foundation and the McKinsey Center for Business and Environment, pp. 1 -22. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-6526(2400977-6/sref31)
  3. Verghese, K., Lewis, H., Lockrey, S., Williams, H., 2015. Packaging s role in minimizing http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0959-6526(2400977-6/sref37)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yadav, P., Silvenius, F., Katajajuuri, J.-M., & Leinonen, I.
Affiliations
Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Yadav, Pooja
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
448
Pages
141529
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392383445
Cited by
59
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 10
FWCI
6.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Strategic Research Council
  • Academy of Finland (346597)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
single-use plastic packaging, global warming potential, container recycling, plastic waste, cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review