Circular economy in wastewater treatment plants: Treatment of contaminants of emerging concerns (CECs) in effluent using sludge-based activated carbon
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Activated carbon is the most common adsorbent because it exhibits high removal efficiency.
“The most common adsorbent is activated carbon since it exhibits high efficiency in the removal (Bouchelkia et al. 2023; Fito et al. 2023; B. A. Mohamed et al. 2023; Obayomi et al. 2023; Raninga et al. 2023; Valério Filho et al. 2023).”
From Fundamental properties and sustainable applications of the natural zeolite clinoptilolite (2024) · cites this paper as B. A. Mohamed et al. 2023
Cites
Gagliano, E., Sgroi, M., Falciglia, P. P., Vagliasindi, F. G. A., & Roccaro, P. (2020) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.115381 · Cited by 1,249 · see citing works
Pham, T.-T., & Proulx, S. (1997) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(97)00025-0 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Sun, S., Jia, L., Li, B., Yuan, A., Kong, L., Qi, H., Ma, W., Zhang, A., & Wu, Y. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.029 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Adsorption kinetics of 2,2',4,4'-tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-47) on maize straw-derived biochars
LIU, G., SONG, Y., SHENG, H., YE, M., STEDTFELD, R. D., BIAN, Y., GU, C., JIANG, X., & WANG, F. (2019) · Pedosphere · doi:10.1016/s1002-0160(18)60063-3 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fundamental properties and sustainable applications of the natural zeolite clinoptilolite
Grifasi, N., Ziantoni, B., Fino, D., & Piumetti, M. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-33656-5 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
“The most common adsorbent is activated carbon since it exhibits high efficiency in the removal (Bouchelkia et al. 2023; Fito et al. 2023; B. A. Mohamed et al. 2023; Obayomi et al. 2023; Raninga et al. 2023; Valério Filho et al. 2023).”
- Authors
- Mohamed, B. A., Hamid, H., Montoya-Bautista, C. V., & Li, L. Y.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Loretta Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 389
- Pages
- 136095
- ISSN
- 0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4319170617
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mitacs (IT14321, IT19789)
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- emerging contaminants, wastewater treatment plant effluent, biosolids, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polybrominated diphenyl ethers, PFAS, adsorption, sewage sludge valorization, circular economy, seasonal variation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
