CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamic estimation of end-of-life electric vehicle batteries in the EU-27 considering reuse, remanufacturing and recycling options

Kastanaki, Eleni, Giannis, Apostolos·2023·Journal of Cleaner Production
DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136349
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136349

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Abdelbaky, 2021, On the influence of second use, future battery technologies, and battery lifetime on the maximum recycled content of future electric vehicle batteries in Europe, Waste Manage. (Tucson, Ariz.), 180
  2. Ahmadi, 2014, Energy efficiency of Li-ion battery packs re-used in stationary power applications, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, 8, 9, 10.1016/j.seta.2014.06.006 · DOI
  3. Ai, 2019, US end-of-life electric vehicle batteries: dynamic inventory modeling and spatial analysis for regional solutions, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 145, 208, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.021 · DOI
  4. Albertsen, 2021, Circular business models for electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries: an analysis of current practices of vehicle manufacturers and policies in the EU, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 172, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105658 · DOI
  5. Assunção, 2016, Technical and economic assessment of the secondary use of repurposed electric vehicle batteries in the residential sector to support solar energy, Appl. Energy, 181, 120, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.056 · DOI
  6. Bobba, 2019, How will second-use of batteries affect stocks and flows in the EU? A model for traction Li-ion batteries, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 145, 279, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.022 · DOI
  7. Casals, 2018, Second life batteries lifespan: rest of useful life and environmental analysis, J. Environ. Manag., 232, 354, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.046 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Castro, 2021, End-of-life automotive lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in Brazil: prediction of flows and revenues by 2030, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 169
  9. Crespo, 2022, Prospects on end of life electric vehicle batteries through 2050 in Catalonia, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 180
  10. Eom, 2007, Life prediction and reliability assessment of lithium secondary batteries, J. Power Sources, 174, 954, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.06.208 · DOI
  11. Fallah, 2021, End-of-Life electric vehicle battery stock estimation in Ireland through integrated energy and circular economy modelling, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 174, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105753 · DOI
  12. Hart, 2014, Modeling of second-life batteries for use in a CERTS microgrid, IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), 1
  13. Hoarau, 2022, An assessment of the European regulation on battery recycling for electric vehicles, Energy Pol., 162, 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112770 · DOI
  14. Hua, 2021, Toward sustainable reuse of retired lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 168, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105249 · DOI
  15. Islam, 2019, E-waste in Australia: Generation estimation and untapped material recovery and revenue potential, J. Clean. Prod., 237, 117787, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117787 · DOI
  16. Kalmykova, 2017, Portable battery lifespans and new estimation method for battery collection rate based on a lifespan modeling approach, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 120, 65, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.006 · DOI
  17. Kamran, 2021, A dynamic material flow analysis of lithium-ion battery metals for electric vehicles and grid storage in the UK: assessing the impact of shared mobility and end-of-life strategies, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 167, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105412 · DOI
  18. Kastanaki, 2021, Dynamic estimation of future obsolete laptop flows and embedded critical raw materials: the case study of Greece, Waste Manage. (Tucson, Ariz.), 132, 74, 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.017 · DOI
  19. Kastanaki, 2022, Forecasting quantities of critical raw materials in obsolete feature and smart phones in Greece: a path to circular economy, J. Environ. Manag., 307, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114566 · DOI
  20. Kastanaki, 2022, Energy decarbonisation in the European Union: assessment of photovoltaic waste recycling potential, Renew. Energy, 192, 1, 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.098 · DOI
  21. Kotak, 2021, End of electric vehicle batteries: reuse vs. Recycle, Energies, 14, 2217, 10.3390/en14082217 · DOI
  22. Kwade, 2018, Recycling of lithium-ion batteries, 10.1007/978-3-319-70572-9 · DOI
  23. Lee, 2022, What is the optimized cost for a used battery?: economic analysis in case of energy storage system as 2nd life of battery, J. Clean. Prod., 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133669 · DOI
  24. Neubauer, 2015, A second life for electric vehicle batteries: answering questions on battery degradation and value, SAE Int. J. Mater. Manuf., 8, 21, 10.4271/2015-01-1306 · DOI
  25. Olivetti, 2017, Lithium-Ion battery supply chain considerations: analysis of potential bottlenecks in critical metals, Joule, 1, 229, 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Peters, 2017, The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters—a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 67, 491, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Qiao, 2020, Potential impact of the end-of-life batteries recycling of electric vehicles on lithium demand in China: 2010–2050, Sci. Total Environ.
  28. Rallo, 2020, Lithium-ion battery 2nd life used as a stationary energy storage system: ageing and economic analysis in two real cases, J. Clean. Prod., 272, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122584 · DOI
  29. Sathre, 2015, Energy and climate effects of second-life use of electric vehicle batteries in California through 2050, J. Power Sources, 288, 82, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.04.097 · DOI
  30. Shafique, 2022, Material flow analysis for end-of-life lithium-ion batteries from battery electric vehicles in the USA and China, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 178, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106061 · DOI
  31. Volan, 2021, Scenarios for end-of-life (EOL) electric vehicle batteries in China, Revista de Gestão, 28, 335, 10.1108/REGE-12-2020-0143 · DOI
  32. Wang, 2013, Enhancing e-waste estimates: Improving data quality by multivariate input–output analysis, Waste Manage., 33, 2397, 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.005 · DOI
  33. White, 2020, Repurposed electric vehicle battery performance in second-life electricity grid frequency regulation service, J. Energy Storage, 28, 10.1016/j.est.2020.101278 · DOI
  34. Wöhrl, 2021, Crashed electric vehicle handling and recommendations—state of the art in Germany, Energies, 14, 1040, 10.3390/en14041040 · DOI
  35. Wrålsen, 2021, Circular business models for lithium-ion batteries-Stakeholders, barriers, and drivers, J. Clean. Prod., 317, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128393 · DOI
  36. Xu, 2020, Future material demand for automotive lithium-based batteries, Commun Mater, 1, 99, 10.1038/s43246-020-00095-x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zhu, 2021, End-of-life or second-life options for retired electric vehicle batteries, Cell Rep. Phys. Sci., 2
  38. Ziemann, 2018, Modeling the potential impact of lithium recycling from EV batteries on lithium demand: a dynamic MFA approach, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 133, 76, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.031 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 126

Metadata

Authors
Kastanaki, E., & Giannis, A.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
393
Pages
136349
ISSN
0959-6526
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136349
Cited by
126
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic estimation of end-of-life electric vehicle batteries in the EU-27 considering reuse, remanufacturing and recycling options. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136349
The paper
Kastanaki, E., & Giannis, A. (2023). Dynamic estimation of end-of-life electric vehicle batteries in the EU-27 considering reuse, remanufacturing and recycling options. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136349