Cited by 18Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseAnesthesia and Pain Management

Taxane modulation of anesthetic sensitivity in surgery for nonmetastatic breast cancer

Linganna, Regina E., Levy, Warren J., Dmochowski, Ivan J., Eckenhoff, Roderic G., Speck, Rebecca M.·2015·Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Abstract

Study objective and design The mechanism of action of commonly used general anesthetics is largely unknown. One hypothesized mechanism is through modulation of microtubule stability. Taxanes, a subset of chemotherapeutic drugs known to alter microtubule stability and commonly used to treat breast cancer, offer a natural experiment to test our hypothesis that patients exposed to taxanes prior to surgery, as compared to after surgery, would have a partial resistance to general anesthetics.Setting, patients, and measurements The anesthetic record of adult women with nonmetastatic breast cancer was used to obtain changes in heart rate and blood pressure surrounding incision, and the amount of inhaled anesthetic agent, induction, and rescue drugs administered.Main results Change in blood pressure in response to incision was significantly higher in the neoadjuvant group (P = .03), whereas change in heart rate was not (P = .53). A greater amount of morphine was administered in the neoadjuvant group (26.3 vs 15.5 mg, P = .02), although not a higher concentration of inhaled anesthetics (P = .15).Conclusion These results suggest that the alteration of microtubule stability is one of a number of mechanisms of inhaled anesthetics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.05.001

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vivo relevance of anesthetic action on the cytoskeleton is validated in tadpoles showing increased anesthetic resistance with microtubule-stabilizing drugs and suggested in humans.

    “The in vivo relevance of anesthetic action on the cytoskeleton has been validated in tadpoles that demonstrate increased anesthetic resistance in the presence of microtubule-stabilizing drugs and also suggested in humans [85, 87].”

    From The Biology of General Anesthesia from Paramecium to Primate (2019) · cites this paper as [87]

  • Our findings are consistent with the report of partial anesthetic resistance in human surgical patients treated with taxane MT-stabilizing chemotherapy.

    “Our findings are consistent with the report of partial anesthetic resistance in human surgical patients treated with taxane MT-stabilizing chemotherapy (Linganna et al., 2015) that was a primary motivation for our study in rats.”

    From Microtubule-stabilizer epothilone B delays anesthetic-induced unconsciousness in rats (2024) · cites this paper as Linganna et al., 2015

  • There was no significant change in heart rate or anesthetic delivery during surgery in the taxane group compared with controls.

    “there was no significant change in the heart rate or anesthetic delivery during surgery in the taxane group as compared with controls.”

    From Microtubule-stabilizer epothilone B delays anesthetic-induced unconsciousness in rats (2024) · cites this paper as Linganna et al., 2015

  • Recipients of taxane chemotherapy had a significantly elevated blood pressure response to incision during breast cancer surgery and required significantly more opioid analgesic compared with patients who did not receive taxane chemotherapy.

    “Recipients of taxane chemotherapy had a significantly elevated blood pressure response to incision during surgery for breast cancer and required significantly more opioid analgesic, as compared with patients who did not receive taxane chemotherapy (Linganna et al., 2015).”

    From Microtubule-stabilizer epothilone B delays anesthetic-induced unconsciousness in rats (2024) · cites this paper as Linganna et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linganna, R. E., Levy, W. J., Dmochowski, I. J., Eckenhoff, R. G., & Speck, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Speck, Rebecca M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
481-485
ISSN
0952-8180 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126612411
Cited by
18
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Pennsylvania
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
Keywords
taxanes, anesthetic sensitivity, general anesthesia, microtubule stability, non-metastatic breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, inhalational anesthetics, heart rate, morphine use, anesthesia induction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anesthesia, General, Antineoplastic Agents, Blood Pressure, Breast Neoplasms, Drug Interactions, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Mastectomy, Microtubules, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Mastectomy, Segmental, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Anesthetics, General, Taxoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review