Cited by 112Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Treatment and AccessFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Rasch analysis suggested three unidimensional domains for Affiliate Stigma Scale: additional psychometric evaluation

Chang, Chih-Cheng, Su, Jian-An, Tsai, Ching-Shu, Yen, Cheng-Fang, Liu, Jiun-Horng, Lin, Chung-Ying·2015·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Objectives To examine the psychometrics of the Affiliate Stigma Scale using rigorous psychometric analysis: classical test theory (CTT) (traditional) and Rasch analysis (modern). Differential item functioning (DIF) items were also tested using Rasch analysis. Study design and setting Caregivers of relatives with mental illness (n = 453; mean age: 53.29 ± 13.50 years) were recruited from southern Taiwan. Each participant filled out four questionnaires: Affiliate Stigma Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and one background information sheet. Results CTT analyses showed that the Affiliate Stigma Scale had satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.85-0.94) and concurrent validity (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: r = -0.52 to -0.46; Beck Anxiety Inventory: r = 0.27-0.34). Rasch analyses supported the unidimensionality of three domains in the Affiliate Stigma Scale and indicated four DIF items (affect domain: 1; cognitive domain: 3) across gender. Conclusion Our findings, based on rigorous statistical analysis, verified the psychometrics of the Affiliate Stigma Scale and reported its DIF items. We conclude that the three domains of the Affiliate Stigma Scale can be separately used and are suitable for measuring the affiliate stigma of caregivers of relatives with mental illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.01.018

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The satisfactory psychometric properties of the MBI-HSS-MP are not influenced by the present sample's characteristics.

    “reliability findings from the Rasch model indicate that the satisfactory psychometric properties of the MBI-HSS-MP are not influenced by the present sample's characteristics [23, 35].”
  • Different subgroups in the present sample (gender and profession group) share the same interpretations toward all the MBI-HSS-MP items.

    “no substantial DIF was displayed for any MBI-HSS-MP items, which implies that different subgroups in the present sample (i.e., gender and profession group) share the same interpretations toward all the MBI-HSS-MP items [23, 35].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, C.-C., Su, J.-A., Tsai, C.-S., Yen, C.-F., Liu, J.-H., & Lin, C.-Y.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lin, Chung-Ying
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
674-683
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057306955
Cited by
112
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  • National Cheng Kung University
  • Ministry of Education (CMRPG6C0161)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
affiliate stigma, psychometric validation, Rasch analysis, differential item functioning, unidimensionality, self-esteem, anxiety, gender differences
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Taiwan, Comorbidity, Caregivers, Age of Onset, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review