Rasch analysis suggested three unidimensional domains for Affiliate Stigma Scale: additional psychometric evaluation
Abstract
Objectives To examine the psychometrics of the Affiliate Stigma Scale using rigorous psychometric analysis: classical test theory (CTT) (traditional) and Rasch analysis (modern). Differential item functioning (DIF) items were also tested using Rasch analysis. Study design and setting Caregivers of relatives with mental illness (n = 453; mean age: 53.29 ± 13.50 years) were recruited from southern Taiwan. Each participant filled out four questionnaires: Affiliate Stigma Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Beck Anxiety Inventory, and one background information sheet. Results CTT analyses showed that the Affiliate Stigma Scale had satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.85-0.94) and concurrent validity (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: r = -0.52 to -0.46; Beck Anxiety Inventory: r = 0.27-0.34). Rasch analyses supported the unidimensionality of three domains in the Affiliate Stigma Scale and indicated four DIF items (affect domain: 1; cognitive domain: 3) across gender. Conclusion Our findings, based on rigorous statistical analysis, verified the psychometrics of the Affiliate Stigma Scale and reported its DIF items. We conclude that the three domains of the Affiliate Stigma Scale can be separately used and are suitable for measuring the affiliate stigma of caregivers of relatives with mental illness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The satisfactory psychometric properties of the MBI-HSS-MP are not influenced by the present sample's characteristics.
“reliability findings from the Rasch model indicate that the satisfactory psychometric properties of the MBI-HSS-MP are not influenced by the present sample's characteristics [23, 35].”
From Psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS-MP) (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Different subgroups in the present sample (gender and profession group) share the same interpretations toward all the MBI-HSS-MP items.
“no substantial DIF was displayed for any MBI-HSS-MP items, which implies that different subgroups in the present sample (i.e., gender and profession group) share the same interpretations toward all the MBI-HSS-MP items [23, 35].”
From Psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS-MP) (2022) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116 · see citing works
Meta-analysis of stigma and mental health
Mak, W. W. S., Poon, C. Y. M., Pun, L. Y. K., & Cheung, S. F. (2007) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.015 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory for Medical Personnel (MBI-HSS-MP)
Lin, C.-Y., Alimoradi, Z., Griffiths, M. D., & Pakpour, A. H. (2022) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08868 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
“The main benefit of using Rasch analysis is to provide psychometric evidence based on the features of being sample-free [23].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
- Authors
- Chang, C.-C., Su, J.-A., Tsai, C.-S., Yen, C.-F., Liu, J.-H., & Lin, C.-Y.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology (TW)
- Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
- Chi Mei Medical Center (TW)
- National Cheng Kung University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Chung-Ying
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 674-683
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057306955
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 13.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- National Cheng Kung University
- Ministry of Education (CMRPG6C0161)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- affiliate stigma, psychometric validation, Rasch analysis, differential item functioning, unidimensionality, self-esteem, anxiety, gender differences
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Taiwan, Comorbidity, Caregivers, Age of Onset, Social Stigma
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review