Cited by 427Mental Health Treatment and AccessRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPsychology and Mental Health

Meta-analysis of stigma and mental health

Mak, Winnie W.S., Poon, Cecilia Y.M., Pun, Loraine Y.K., Cheung, Shu Fai·2007·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

Recent research has emphasized the adverse effects of stigma on minority groups' mental health. Governments and service agencies have put much effort into combating stigma against a variety of conditions. Nevertheless, previous empirical research on the stigma-mental health relationship has yielded inconclusive findings, varying from strong negative to zero correlations. Thus, whether stigma is related significantly to mental health is yet to be confirmed. Using meta-analysis, the associations between stigma and mental health from 49 empirical studies were examined across various stigmatized conditions and mental health indices. Possible moderators were also explored. The mean correlation between stigma and average mental health scores corrected for sampling error, unreliability, and other artifacts was -.28 (N=10,567, k=52). No strong moderators were found, yet meaningful patterns were observed. Implications of the results are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.015

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceived stigma from others is thought to contribute negatively to the mental health of stigmatised groups.

    “Within the mental health literature, perceived stigma from others is thought to contribute negatively to the mental health of stigmatised groups (Mak et al. 2007).”

    From Experiences of autism acceptance and mental health in autistic adults (2018) · cites this paper as Mak et al. 2007

  • Greater perceived public stigma is associated with more self-stigma, more hopelessness, poorer recovery, and reduced quality of life among people with mental health conditions.

    “They also reported more self-stigma, more hopelessness, poorer recovery, and reduced quality of life.17,50”
  • Among people with mental health conditions, perceiving greater public stigma is associated with viewing one's own condition as more threatening.

    “People with mental health conditions who perceived greater public stigma found their own condition more threatening than other respondents.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mak, W. W. S., Poon, C. Y. M., Pun, L. Y. K., & Cheung, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Macau (MO)
Corresponding author
Mak, Winnie W.S.
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
245-261
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054009020
Cited by
427
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 19
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
stigma, mental health, minority groups, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Humans, Mental Health, Prejudice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review