The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence from diverse clinical populations supported clinical validity of PROMIS pain interference and pain behavior
Open accessAbstract
Objective To evaluate clinical validity, including responsiveness, of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PROMIS-PI) and pain behavior (PROMIS-PB) T-scores.Study design and setting Data were aggregated from longitudinal studies of cancer, chronic low back pain (cLBP), rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and major depressive disorder (MDD). Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare baseline score differences and score changes over time. We calculated standardized response means (SRMs) for subgroups defined by self-reported change in general health and pain.Results A total of 1,357 individuals participated at baseline and 1,225 at follow-up. Hypotheses of significant change in PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB scores were supported in the intervention groups (cLBP and MDD). Differences in baseline scores for COPD exacerbators compared to stable COPD patients were in the hypothesized direction but were not statistically significant. Subgroups reporting better health showed corresponding negative SRM values supporting responsiveness of T-scores to improvement. Responsiveness to decrements was supported in some but not all clinical groups and varied by anchor. More congruent values were obtained when using a pain-specific anchor.Conclusion This study provides evidence that PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PB scores are sensitive to changes in pain in studies of interventions expected to impact pain. The results inform estimation of meaningful change and support power analyses for comparative effectiveness research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These measures have been shown to detect intervention-related change in heterogeneous pain groups [39].”
From A randomized controlled trial of yoga vs nonaerobic exercise for veterans with PTSD: Understanding efficacy, mechanisms of change, and mode of delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 · Cited by 10,764
PAUWELS, R. A., Buist, A. S., CALVERLEY, P. M. A., Jenkins, C. R., & Hurd, S. S. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.163.5.2101039 · Cited by 6,578
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · Cited by 5,128
(2000) · Cited by 4,106
Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Dworkin, R. H., Turk, D. C., Farrar, J. T., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Jensen, M. P., Katz, N. P., Kerns, R. D., Stucki, G., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., et al. (2005) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,732
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Cleeland, 1989, Measurement of pain by subjective report, Adv Pain Res Ther, 12, 391
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Valerio, I. L., Dumanian, G. A., Jordan, S. W., Mioton, L. M., Bowen, B., West, J. M., Porter, K. M., Ko, J. H., Souza, J. M., & Potter, B. K. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.015 · Cited by 292
McDermott, M. M., Spring, B., Berger, J. S., Treat-Jacobson, D., Conte, M. S., Creager, M. A., Criqui, M. H., Ferrucci, L., Gornik, H. L., Guralnik, J. M., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.3275 · Cited by 211
Chen, C. X., Kroenke, K., Stump, T. E., Kean, J., Carpenter, J. S., Krebs, E. E., Bair, M. J., Damush, T. M., & Monahan, P. O. (2018) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001121 · Cited by 199
Patient and Procedural Determinants of Postoperative Pain Trajectories
Vasilopoulos, T., Wardhan, R., Rashidi, P., Fillingim, R. B., Wallace, M. R., Crispen, P. L., Parvataneni, H. K., Prieto, H. A., Machuca, T., Hughes, S. J., et al. (2021) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000003681 · Cited by 158
Mioton, L. M., Dumanian, G. A., Shah, N. M., Qiu, C. S., Ertl, W. J. J., Potter, B. K., Souza, J. M., Valerio, I. L., Ko, J. H., & Jordan, S. W. (2020) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/corr.0000000000001323 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Askew, R. L., Cook, K. F., Revicki, D. A., Cella, D., & Amtmann, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Amtmann, Dagmar
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-05
- Volume
- 73
- Pages
- 103-111
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4957699
- OpenAlex
- W2297767387
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 14.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5u01ar057940-04)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA060068, P30CA060553)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U01AR052171, U01AR057956, U01AR057967, U01AR052186, U01-AR-057940, U01AR057936, U54AR057943, U01AR057929, U01AR052170, U01AR052158, U01AR052155, U01AR052177, U01AR052181, U01AR057971, U01AR057954, U01AR057948, U54AR057926, U54AR057951)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- PROMIS, pain interference, pain behavior, clinical validity, responsiveness, standardized response mean, patient-reported outcomes, chronic low back pain, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, meaningful change, power analysis, comparative effectiveness research
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Pain Measurement, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, United States, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Young Adult, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Self Report, Chronic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
