Cited by 79Clinical practice guidelines implementationCultural Competency in Health CareMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

GRADE equity guidelines 2: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: equity extension of the guideline development checklist

Open access
Akl, Elie A., Welch, Vivian, Pottie, Kevin, Eslava-Schmalbach, Javier, Darzi, Andrea, Sola, Ivan, Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal, Singh, Jasvinder +19 more·2017·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective To provide guidance for guideline developers on how to consider health equity at key stages of the guideline development process. Study design and setting Literature review followed by group discussions and consensus building. Results The key stages at which guideline developers could consider equity include setting priorities, guideline group membership, identifying the target audience(s), generating the guideline questions, considering the importance of outcomes and interventions, deciding what evidence to include and searching for evidence, summarizing the evidence and considering additional information, wording of recommendations, and evaluation and use. We provide examples of how guidelines have actually considered equity at each of these stages. Conclusion Guideline projects should consider the aforementioned suggestions for recommendations that are equity sensitive.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.017

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A proposal has been made and implemented with the Development of Equity focused Clinical Practice Guidelines under the GRADE approach, although it does not relate specifically to implementation research for health programs or interventions.

    “A proposal has been made and implemented with the Development of Equity focused Clinical Practice Guidelines under the GRADE approach [43–47], although it does not relate specifically to implementation research for health programs or interventions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [8]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Positively equal A guide to addressing equality issues in developing NICE clinical guidelines Second edition 2012
  2. [22]Organization WH Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men and transgender people 2011 26158187
  3. [23]Organization WH Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection 2013 24716260
  4. [25]Organization WH Prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections for sex workers in low- and middle-income countries Recommendations for a public health approach 2012 26131541
  5. [40]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Acutely ill patients in hospital: Recognition of and response to acute illness in adults in hospital National Institute for Health and Care Excellence 2007 21204323
  6. [41]Organization WH The use of bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - Interim policy guidance 23967502

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akl, E. A., Welch, V., Pottie, K., Eslava-Schmalbach, J., Darzi, A., Sola, I., Katikireddi, S. V., Singh, J., Murad, M. H., Meerpohl, J., Stanev, R., Lang, E., Matovinovic, E., Shea, B., Agoritsas, T., Alexander, P. E., Snellman, A., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Gloss, D., Thabane, L., Shi, C., Stein, A. T., Sharaf, R., Briel, M., Guyatt, G., Schünemann, H., & Tugwell, P.
Affiliations
  • American University of Beirut (LB)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO)
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • University of Washington Tacoma (US)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • National Board of Health and Welfare (SE)
  • Charleston Area Medical Center (US)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • University Hospital of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Akl, Elie A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
90
Pages
68-75
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613538222
Cited by
79
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12017/13, MC_UU_12017/15, MC_UU_12017, SPHSU15, SPHSU13)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
health equity, GRADE, guideline development, target audience, evidence selection
MeSH terms
Health Equity, Humans, Research Design, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Vulnerable Populations, Evidence-Based Practice, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review