Cited by 22Delphi Technique in ResearchReliability and Agreement in MeasurementSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Response changes in Delphi processes: why is it important to provide high-quality feedback to delphi participants?

Open access
Khodyakov, Dmitry, Chen, Christine·2020·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.029

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khodyakov, D., & Chen, C.
Affiliations
RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Khodyakov, Dmitry
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
125
Pages
160-161
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3025059080
Cited by
22
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
Delphi method, group feedback, consensus building, online forums, participant behavior
MeSH terms
Delphi Technique, Humans, Patients, Caregivers, Guidelines as Topic, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review